Thursday, January 05, 2012
Zambrano v Volstad
Performance-expectation-wise, let’s call it even. So, this is strictly a financial discussion, to make sure it all works out evenly.
Cubs were originally on the hook for 18MM$. Now, they are on the hook for 15MM$, plus whatever Volstad costs them, which is probably 9MM$ over the next 3 years. So, they spend an extra 6MM$ to turn Zambrano into Volstad this year, AND the next two years. That sounds like a pretty good deal, as paying for two more years of Zambrano (sans headache), or someone of his performance level, in 2013-14 would have likely run the Cubs 10MM$.
Marlins were on the hook for 9MM$ for Volstad (though they could cut him after each season naturally), but now they are on the hook for Zambrano for 3MM$ (and they can cut him loose right after). If Z pitches like Volstad over the next 3 years, it’ll cost them 13MM$ (3MM$ for this year, and say 2/10 for Z or someone like him, sans headache). Instead of 9MM$.
So, it looks like the Cubs get a 4MM$ surplus in the deal, but, perhaps Z is better than we’re suggesting. Throw-in the headache effect, and the Cubs looked like they cost as good as they could possibly get here, in terms of flipping one pitcher for another pitcher.


Recent comments
Older comments
Page 1 of 344 pages 1 2 3 > Last »Complete Archive – By Category
Complete Archive – By Date