THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

Filter posts by...

 

Thursday, April 05, 2007

Would Babe Ruth Be Average Today?

By Tangotiger, 12:28 PM

Six or seven years ago, I dared ask the question on Baseball Boards.  I laid out the process and came up with the answer: yes.  The discussion that followed was illuminating and exasperating.  The least appealing of the comments, rather than criticizing the process, criticized the conclusion!  The problem, which no one pointed out at the time, was regression toward the mean, the single-most important concept to understand, if you are going to analyze sample data.  I didn’t know about the concept back then.  Once you handle that, the answer changed dramatically: no.  Ruth would still be RUTH, but not so RUTHIAN. 

The process was similar to what Dick Cramer did, as explained in The Hidden Game of Baseball, but I handled the age adjustment (he didn’t, it seemed).  His results can be dismissed.  I intended to finally write the followup for THT two years ago, but ended up shelving it.  I’ve always intended to finish it up. 

BP’s Between the Numbers looked at the issue, but, the execution was lacking.  The drawing of the adjusted line really didn’t make much sense.  It almost seemed like the author realized the problem, and couldn’t put his finger on it.  That work too I would dismiss. Bill James’ timeline is also an effort to just put something in.  Now we’ve got David Gassko handling the problem.  If we look at his chart, we see that a player around 1950 would have his wOBA of .400 drop to .340 today.  That’s a drop of 31 runs per 600 PA.  This seems almost as preposterous as Cramer’s findings, even though he took care of the regression toward the mean issue.  (My guess is that David didn’t handle the age adjustment.) But, there’s a part two coming up, so we’ll see what he did.  IIRC, my work suggests about a 10-run change per 600 PA in that time period, and virtually flat in the last 30 years or so.  I really ought to dust that off.  The process is semi-reasonable, and the results pass the sniff test.

(125) Comments • 2007/04/28 • SabermetricsForecastingTalent_Distribution
Page 1 of 1 pages

Latest...

COMMENTS

May 26 13:18
What makes for a successful GM?

May 26 12:47
Do pitcher’s reach back for velocity when needed?

May 26 07:27
“Why Kickstarter works”

May 26 03:03
Pete Palmer’s new book: Basic Ball

May 26 01:11
Largest demonstration in Canadian history?

May 25 19:41
What sabermetrics is NOT

May 25 16:59
Howard Stern

May 25 12:51
Chad Curtis

May 25 11:26
Lack of hustle during a game

May 25 10:58
Rooting for laundry

THREADS

April 05, 2007
Would Babe Ruth Be Average Today?