THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

Filter posts by...

 

Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Why teams pay equal prices for free agents?

By Tangotiger, 11:57 AM

Phil says because we’re already in equilibrium, and so, the cost of any product or service will have the same marginal impact, regardless of who you are.

It’s not just players who are more valuable to the Yankees: it’s everything. Baseball gloves, say. Obviously, Derek Jeter’s glove is more important than Yuniesky Betancourt’s glove: without a glove for Jeter, he can’t play: and the Yankees lose a lot more money with Jeter sitting out gloveless than the Royals do with Betancourt sitting out gloveless. But both teams pay about the same amount for the actual glove. The same is true for everything a team uses: jet fuel, bus service, the food served in the clubhouse after the game, and so on. Why would wins be any different?
...
So when will teams choose to buy exactly 1,000 WAR? From the graph, we see that happens when wins cost exactly $4MM each. And so, teams bid up the price of free agents exactly to 4 million dollars.

No free agents will go for $3 million a win, because then teams would want to buy 1150 WAR when only 1000 are available, and the price will be bid up. Wins can’t go for $5 million, because then teams would want to buy only 800 WAR when 1000 are available, and the remaining free agents would be knocking down GMs’ doors offering to sign for less.

The equilibrium price, in our example, is $4 million, and that’s what wins will go for.

...

But still, it seems weird that every team pays the same amount per win. Aren’t wins worth more to the Phillies than the Royals?

Yes, the *average* win is worth more to the Phillies than the Royals. The *Nth* win is worth more to the Phillies than the Royals. But the *marginal* win is worth almost exactly the same.

It’s probably more accurate to say that the LAST (few) wins purchased is worth almost exactly the same.  And since everyone is in equilibrium, then everyone pays the same for whatever is out there.

Works for me.  So, a linear wins to dollar multiplier for players.  Regardless of how good or bad you are, and regardless of how much a team is worth or not.  Wonderful.  That’s the drum I’ve been beating, and maybe this is confirmation bias, but it works for me.

(60) Comments • 2010/04/22 • SabermetricsFinances
Page 1 of 1 pages

Latest...

COMMENTS

May 26 11:03
What makes for a successful GM?

May 26 07:27
“Why Kickstarter works”

May 26 03:03
Pete Palmer’s new book: Basic Ball

May 26 01:11
Largest demonstration in Canadian history?

May 25 19:41
What sabermetrics is NOT

May 25 16:59
Howard Stern

May 25 15:12
Do pitcher’s reach back for velocity when needed?

May 25 12:51
Chad Curtis

May 25 11:26
Lack of hustle during a game

May 25 10:58
Rooting for laundry

THREADS

April 20, 2010
Why teams pay equal prices for free agents?