THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

Filter posts by...

 

Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Why baseball fans, why? (inter-conference play)

By Tangotiger, 09:45 AM

This issue never exists in NHL, NFL, or presumably NBA.  Indeed, in the NHL, where fans have been treated to varying degrees of inter-conference play over the years, the consensus is that you want some inter-conference play.  Definitely not zero inter-conference play.  But also not a completely balanced schedule (back when they had 21 teams, they at times played 4 games against each team, whether intra-conference or inter-conference).

Now, I am an equally big NHL fan as I am an MLB fan (*).  And I don’t have this split personality where I treat the two leagues as so different that the argument I’d make for NHL inter-conference play would be the opposite that I’d make for MLB inter-conference play.  We talked about this in the past, where we noted that in the other three leagues, about 20-25% of all games played are inter-conference, but that in MLB, it’s 10%.  So, if there should be a push on changing the inter-conference play in MLB, it should be toward what the other leagues have determined through a longer history of inter-conference play, and that would mean doubling the number of MLB inter-conference games.

(*) In the old days in the 1980s, we’d call it Baseball or Major League Baseball, and never MLB.  I don’t know when MLB came along, but it was probably a useful internet shorthand.

But still, you get fans imploring for a switch to no inter-conference play at all.  And I don’t think those same fans would make the argument for the other leagues they watch.

So, the question is why?  Is it inertia (nee tradition) or status quo?  Is it that they are still old enough to remember no inter-conference games at all?  Is it that MLB calls their two conferences “leagues”, when they are really conferences (they share all rules, except the DH; they share the draft; etc)?

Why would a fan that follows at least two of these leagues treat MLB so differently?  I’m not talking about baseball-only fans; I’m talking about fans of baseball plus other leagues.  This question goes out to them.

(31) Comments • 2011/05/18 • SabermetricsMLB_Management
Page 1 of 1 pages

Latest...

COMMENTS

May 26 09:49
What makes for a successful GM?

May 26 07:27
“Why Kickstarter works”

May 26 03:03
Pete Palmer’s new book: Basic Ball

May 26 01:11
Largest demonstration in Canadian history?

May 25 19:41
What sabermetrics is NOT

May 25 16:59
Howard Stern

May 25 15:12
Do pitcher’s reach back for velocity when needed?

May 25 12:51
Chad Curtis

May 25 11:26
Lack of hustle during a game

May 25 10:58
Rooting for laundry

THREADS

May 18, 2011
Why baseball fans, why? (inter-conference play)