THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

Filter posts by...

 

Monday, April 05, 2010

What if… we were wrong?

By Tangotiger, 09:55 AM

Jeremy writes a rebuttal to Simmons in which he takes the argumentative position that sabermetrics was wrong.

And this is pretty much how I deal with things: If you had a clean slate, would you be doing things closer to as you have always been doing it, or closer to the exact opposite of that?  This is why sabermetrics, and OBP, is destined to live as long as baseball lives.  If it didn’t exist, it would have been invented.  Batting Average?  ERA?  No, those things would not exist.  Batting average has silly rules regarding SF and reaching on error.  If you were to correct those things, it would still live as one of those niche stats.  The idea of reconstructing an inning based on removing recorded errors?  And doing this for runs, but not for hits and walks?  Never.

Once you go saber, you never go back.  That’s how you know you chose the right path.

(7) Comments • 2010/04/06 • SabermetricsMedia
Page 1 of 1 pages

Latest...

COMMENTS

May 26 09:49
What makes for a successful GM?

May 26 07:27
“Why Kickstarter works”

May 26 03:03
Pete Palmer’s new book: Basic Ball

May 26 01:11
Largest demonstration in Canadian history?

May 25 19:41
What sabermetrics is NOT

May 25 16:59
Howard Stern

May 25 15:12
Do pitcher’s reach back for velocity when needed?

May 25 12:51
Chad Curtis

May 25 11:26
Lack of hustle during a game

May 25 10:58
Rooting for laundry

THREADS

April 05, 2010
What if… we were wrong?