THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

Filter posts by...

 

Friday, January 04, 2008

UZR positional adjustments

By Tangotiger, 01:48 PM

MGL was nice enough to send me the 2007 UZR.  I can’t release the details, but I can do what I do.  As I like to do, I’ll compare the UZR by positions, for the guys who play multiple positions. 

For the OF, this is no sweat, since the skill set involved in all three positions is very similar.  From 2003-07 (that’s 5 years of data), I’ve got 7523 matching games for LF/RF.  For example, take Geoff Jenkins: he has 351 games in LF and 280 in RF.  I count that as 280 “matching games” (the minimum of the two). 

Games, by the way, is basically based on number of flyballs hit to the player divided by the league average number per game.

Do this for the 300 players that played both positions.  Add it up, and you have 7523 games.  The UZR for those guys, while in LF, was +0.7 runs.  And those exact same players, while in RF, was +0.1 runs.  That is, the comparison points in LF and RF are different for the same guys.  In order for you to standout in LF more, you have to be compared against inferior players.  And that’s what we have here: the average fielding LF is 0.6 runs worse than the average fielding RF.  And that’s just in range.  (If you include the arm, we’re probably talking about a 2 run gap between LF and RF.)

When we repeat this for LF/CF, we get 5863 games.  Those players are +4.4 in LF and -5.9 in CF, per 162 games.  That’s a 10.3 run gap.  For RF/CF (4930 games): +2.1 in RF and -9.9 in CF.  That’s a 12 run gap.  We have to make one adjustment though.  CF get about 30-35% more BIP than in the corners.  Scaling the CF opportunitues down to the number of LF/RF opportunities, we get:
LF/CF: +4.4 / -4.4
RF/CF: +2.1 / -7.4

Now, the LF/CF gap is 8.8 runs, while it’s 9.5 runs for RF/CF.  From this standpoint, the RF is 0.7 runs worse than the LF.

Overall, we can say that the avg LF = avg RF which is 9 runs worse than the avg CF (when scaled to the number of opportunities of LF/RF).

I’ll be back later for the other positions…

(34) Comments • 2008/01/21 • SabermetricsFielding
Page 1 of 1 pages

Latest...

COMMENTS

Feb 11 22:33
Clutch analogy

Feb 11 22:08
Who is Jeremy Lin?

Feb 11 20:11
Fighting leads to goals?

Feb 11 19:55
Why do players get crappy caps?

Feb 11 19:12
Hero of the month: Brittney Baxter

Feb 11 17:59
MGL: Today on Clubhouse Confidential

Feb 11 16:48
Reader Mail of the Day: Why do we need X years of fielding data?  And what about outliers?

Feb 11 10:29
Dwight Evans

Feb 11 02:12
Performance through the ages

Feb 10 23:01
For Your Soul

THREADS

January 04, 2008
UZR positional adjustments