THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

Filter posts by...

 

Wednesday, December 08, 2010

Tom Verducci’s conflict of interest

By Tangotiger, 10:43 AM

People, using their role of journalist, cannot according to journalistic principles, create the news.  They can only report it.

People, as individuals, can votes for awards, thereby creating the news.

If a person, who happens to be an individual and a journalist, wants to vote for an award, he must do so in the role of an individual.  He is not a journalist 24/7.  For that moment in time, he is an individual.  Just like when he votes for his member of congress.

Now, what happens if someone questions who you voted for, or thinks that the voting body sucks?  Well, you, as an individual, can speak out, in your forum of whatever forum individuals have.  You, as a journalist, since you did not vote as a journalist, cannot defend yourself as an individual.

Basically, your two roles, one as individual and one as journalist, must be treated as two human beings.  Verducci the journalist should not be defending Verducci the individual.

Murray Chass make allegations against you that were erroneous?  Well, Verducci can speak out as an individual.  He can’t speak out as a journalist about it, because he did not vote as a journalist.  The correct forum for Verducci to speak out would be as a blogger.

However, Verducci the individual and blogger, agreed to not reveal his vote.  That a high profile person such as himself put himself in a position of conflict of interest doesn’t mean that he gets to somehow use his journalistic pulpit to save himself and to get a special dispensation from the committee to do so.

Basically, Verducci put himself in a no-win situation, by not being able to separate the individual from the journalist.

Hey, it’s all great that we feel like a kid that we get to vote on the HOF.  The media’s hypocrisy in these matters is overwhelming, and too few in the media are willing to acknowledge the fact.  And too few are going to blast Verducci for not only creating his conflict of interest, but also defending it.

Don’t report on news you create.  Is that so hard to do?

(27) Comments • 2010/12/14 • SabermetricsMedia
Page 1 of 1 pages

Latest...

COMMENTS

May 26 12:47
Do pitcher’s reach back for velocity when needed?

May 26 12:25
What makes for a successful GM?

May 26 07:27
“Why Kickstarter works”

May 26 03:03
Pete Palmer’s new book: Basic Ball

May 26 01:11
Largest demonstration in Canadian history?

May 25 19:41
What sabermetrics is NOT

May 25 16:59
Howard Stern

May 25 12:51
Chad Curtis

May 25 11:26
Lack of hustle during a game

May 25 10:58
Rooting for laundry

THREADS

December 08, 2010
Tom Verducci’s conflict of interest