THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

Filter posts by...

 

Monday, August 23, 2010

The Producers

By Tangotiger, 04:54 PM

Kristi asks:

So, what do you think about the information that has come to light with regards to the Pirates?  Are you mad?  Do you think MLB should find a way to keep owners of losing teams from making money?  Is revenue sharing a mistake?

What came to mind when I read that was The Producers:

Max begs Leo to cook the books. `Look at me,` he pleads. Once the King of Broadway, now reduced to romancing little old ladies to back him and wearing cardboard belts. Leo reluctantly agrees and returns to Max`s books. After some calculations, he realizes that `under the right circumstances, a producer could actually make more money with a flop than he can with a hit.` Max sits up, an idea forming in his unscrupulous head.

Leo explains. The IRS isn`t interested in a show that flopped, so a producer could raise a million dollars, put on a $100,000 flop and keep the rest. Max proposes the ultimate scheme: `Step 1: We find the worst play ever written. Step 2: We hire the worst director in town. Step 3: We raise two million dollars...One for me, one for you. There`s a lot of little old ladies out there! Step 4: We hire the worst actors in New York and open on Broadway and before you can say Step 5, we close on Broadway, take our two million and go to Rio.`

This is not to say that the Expos and Pirates and Royals and Marlins have intentionally done anything underhanded. 

But clearly there is an opposite-sweet-spot effect, where at some level of revenue (I’ll just make up a number and say 80% to 90% of median), where each increase in revenue dollar does not increase in profit whatsoever.  That is, the cost it takes you to go from 80% to 90% in revenue also has the opportunity cost of decreased revenue tax receipts.  So, either you spend yourself up from really low to low, or you spend yourself up from almost average to average.

On the flip-side there might be another sweet spot, say from 110 to 120% of median revenue, where it’s not worth it to increase your payroll.  Because while every dollar spent might give you a decent ROI under normal circumstances, you getting too high up the revenue chain means you’ve got a revenue tax bill to pay the smaller teams.

Where those actual threshholds are, I’ll leave it to the aspiring among you to figure out.

(1) Comments • 2010/08/24 • SabermetricsFinances
Page 1 of 1 pages

Latest...

COMMENTS

May 26 11:15
What makes for a successful GM?

May 26 07:27
“Why Kickstarter works”

May 26 03:03
Pete Palmer’s new book: Basic Ball

May 26 01:11
Largest demonstration in Canadian history?

May 25 19:41
What sabermetrics is NOT

May 25 16:59
Howard Stern

May 25 15:12
Do pitcher’s reach back for velocity when needed?

May 25 12:51
Chad Curtis

May 25 11:26
Lack of hustle during a game

May 25 10:58
Rooting for laundry

THREADS

August 23, 2010
The Producers