THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

Filter posts by...

 

Sunday, August 14, 2011

The extra playoff team

By Tangotiger, 11:48 AM

In an otherwise balanced article (where his obvious opinion is countered by good arguments by players and officials he quotes), Chass makes a glaring math problem:

Players, he said, think that adding teams to the playoffs would reduce a wild card’s chances of getting to and winning the World Series.
...
But there’s another way to look at it. Under the existing format, 25 percent of the post-season teams (two of eight) are wild cards. If another wild card is added to each league’s playoff, 40 percent of the post-season teams (four of ten) would be wild cards.

In other words, despite the obvious pitching problems, would the addition of wild cards enhance the chances of the World Series winner being a wild card based on simple math?

Murray: no!  That’s because after you get through the bye round, you are still left with the 3 division winners and one wild card team.  You could put all 11 or 14 non-division winners in a knockout competition such that one team from each league comes out as the official wild card team, and the chances of that team winning (rest, fatigue, or chance of a crappy team winning the spot notwithstanding) will remain exactly the same.

I also like how Selig comes off looking good, though Chass intended to show he was a flip-flopper:

The commissioner at one time assured us that the number of wild-card teams would stay at one in each league and would not be increased.

“We kept expanding and eventually you have to add some playoff teams,” Selig said, explaining his change in thinking. And of the wild card itself, he added, “It’s worked out tremendously, better than I thought it would.”

Basically, Selig changed his opinion based on new facts.  Selig’s original opinion is that he couldn’t see how he could possibly go beyond 4 teams in the playoffs per league.  And, after 15 years, now that he sees how it actually work, he has empirical evidence.  He changed his opinion.  This is actually a good thing: people changing their preconceived notions based on data in the real-world.

There’s a million ways to make the playoffs good.  There’s practically no way to make a crappy playoff system, unless you go out of your way to try.  All playoff systems have their merit, and it then becomes a question of what world you prefer to live in.  Paris, Rome, New York, Green Bay.  There’s a world for everyone.

(1) Comments • 2011/08/14 • SabermetricsMLB_Management
Page 1 of 1 pages

Latest...

COMMENTS

May 26 12:25
What makes for a successful GM?

May 26 07:27
“Why Kickstarter works”

May 26 03:03
Pete Palmer’s new book: Basic Ball

May 26 01:11
Largest demonstration in Canadian history?

May 25 19:41
What sabermetrics is NOT

May 25 16:59
Howard Stern

May 25 15:12
Do pitcher’s reach back for velocity when needed?

May 25 12:51
Chad Curtis

May 25 11:26
Lack of hustle during a game

May 25 10:58
Rooting for laundry

THREADS

August 14, 2011
The extra playoff team