THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

Filter posts by...

 

Wednesday, February 02, 2011

The best MLE’s in 2010

By , 06:25 AM

I revamped my MLE’s.  Basically they are component equivalencies derived from looking at the majors to minors (AAA and AA) ratios for players who played at both levels (minors and majors) in the same year or in consecutive years (minors and then majors).  The ratios are different, depending upon if you compare the same year or consecutive years, so I basically use the average of the two.  I first park and league adjust the component stats.  I don’t use different MLE’s for different leagues, as some people do.

Keep in mind that these kinds of MLE’s include regression to the mean.  For example, if a player hits really well in the minors, his stats in the majors are not really a one-to-one translation.  They are a translation plus a regression.

Look at it this way:  Say a player hits 30 HR in AA in 2009.  If he played in 2010 in the minors again and his true talent stayed the same, he would likely hit maybe 22 HR (after regression).  If he plays in the majors in 2010 and hits 15 HR, the “real” translation is 22 to 15 and not 30 to 15.  I, however, and most forecasters, bypass the regression and just use the 30 to 15 translation, which is technically not correct.  In fact, it will make lesser players look worse in the majors then they are likely to be.  Since we are using the 30 to 15 as the MLE translation, we get a ratio of 2 (or .5) even though the “real” ratio should be 22/15 or around 1.5.  So, if a player in the minors hits 10 HR, he will have an MLE of 5.  But, if we regressed him first (say, to 9 HR) and then applied the 1.5 ratio, we would have his MLE at 6.

Anyway, here are my leaders for batters and pitchers:

Hitters (>200 PA)

1) Mike Stanton with an OPS+ (MLE OPS divided by the average major league OPS) of 135
2) Brandon Belt 122
3) Clint Robinson 113
4) Kila Kaaihue 113
5) Matt Rizzotti 112

Honorable mention to Rob Chirinos, Brandon Guyer, and Carlos Santana.

Pitchers ( starters only with >100 IP), based on component ERA

1) Anthony Lerew
2) Josh Tomlin
3) Lucas French
4) Casey Coleman
5) Thomas Diamond

Honorable mention to Blake Beavan, Jeremy Hellickson, and Elih Villanueva.

For relievers only with more than 50 IP:

1) Clay Rapada
2) Jon Albaladejo
3) Justin Thomas
4) Matt Reynolds
5) Robert Manuel

Mention to Joe Bateman, Jason Buursma, Josh Kinney, and Josh Wilkie.

(3) Comments • 2011/02/02 • SabermetricsForecastingMinors_College
Page 1 of 1 pages

Latest...

COMMENTS

May 26 11:15
What makes for a successful GM?

May 26 07:27
“Why Kickstarter works”

May 26 03:03
Pete Palmer’s new book: Basic Ball

May 26 01:11
Largest demonstration in Canadian history?

May 25 19:41
What sabermetrics is NOT

May 25 16:59
Howard Stern

May 25 15:12
Do pitcher’s reach back for velocity when needed?

May 25 12:51
Chad Curtis

May 25 11:26
Lack of hustle during a game

May 25 10:58
Rooting for laundry

THREADS

February 02, 2011
The best MLE’s in 2010