THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

Filter posts by...

 

Monday, May 10, 2010

Steve Trachsel, clutch god

By Tangotiger, 11:30 AM

There were a couple of threads at Primer that linked to someone who showed that Steve Trachsel performed much better in high leverage situations than low leverage situations.

Here’s some data to support that.
1. First at B-r.com, whereby Sean uses an LI of 1.5 (or so) and higher for any pitcher’s plate appearance and calls that a high-leverage situation.  There are roughly 20% PA in MLB that matches this, and for Trachsel himself, that is 16%.  As you expect, a starter has fewer high leverage opportunities than a reliever, but it’s not that much lower.  Starters have plenty of high-leverage situations, and Sean tagged 1754 of those as high-leverage.  Sean also makes life easy for us by showing tOPS+, which is the pitcher’s OPS+ in a particular split, compared to his overall average.  Trachsel is at 88, which means his OPS+ is 12% lower than his overall OPS+.  I can’t tell what his overall OPS+ is, but looking at his ERA+, he was probably league average.  So, he gives up runs at a rate that is 12% lower than his overall average, or about 0.50 runs per 9 IP.

2. Fangraphs also has split data by Leverage Index, but David uses a threshhold of 2.0 (there’s about 10% of all PA like that… for Trachsel, it’s 6%).  David only has the data starting from 2002, but he shows a similar breakdown in his FIP, with his high-Lev performance at 0.50 runs better than his usual.

3. David also tracks “Clutch” which is the difference between the sum of a pitcher’s WPA/LI and the sum of a pitcher’s WPA, divided by the average LI.  So, it looks like this: sum(WPA)/aLI - sum(WPA/LI).  His Clutch score is +9.9 wins, which is enormous.  I would not be surprised if it’s the highest of the Retrosheet time period.  Noted choker ARod is at -7.9 wins, and noted clutcher Tim Raines is at +6.0.

So, by the definition of clutch which says “performs better in high leverage situations than his usual overall”, then Steve Trachsel is a clutch god. 

But, if the definition of clutch is “performs better in high leverage situations than his peers in the same situation”, then Steve Trachsel is a slightly above average pitcher in clutch situations.  By this definition, it is virtually impossible for a great hitter to be considered a choker, and just as impossible for a below-average hitter to be a clutch hitter.

How you define clutch will tell you whether Steve Trachsel if a clutch god or not.  Choose your definition first, and then accept the results, whatever they may be.

(5) Comments • 2010/05/11 • SabermetricsClutch
Page 1 of 1 pages

Latest...

COMMENTS

May 26 09:39
What makes for a successful GM?

May 26 07:27
“Why Kickstarter works”

May 26 03:03
Pete Palmer’s new book: Basic Ball

May 26 01:11
Largest demonstration in Canadian history?

May 25 19:41
What sabermetrics is NOT

May 25 16:59
Howard Stern

May 25 15:12
Do pitcher’s reach back for velocity when needed?

May 25 12:51
Chad Curtis

May 25 11:26
Lack of hustle during a game

May 25 10:58
Rooting for laundry

THREADS

May 10, 2010
Steve Trachsel, clutch god