THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

Filter posts by...

 

Tuesday, April 24, 2007

Should women tennis players get as much as the men?

By Tangotiger, 02:16 PM

No, not necessarily.

Those who support equal pay for equal work would say that it’s obvious that they should.  Just because one group has different genitalia from the other group doesn’t mean they should be compensated differently.  However, compensation is tied-in to revenue.  If you can generate more revenue than someone else, regarless of gender, you get paid more.  We wouldn’t presume that WNBA players should get paid as much as NBA players.  Why do the same in tennis?

Because in tennis, the women and men play in the same tournaments, so it seems hard to determine who is really generating the revenue.  But, with the Canadian Open, we have something interesting: the men and women play in alternating venues each year, in Toronto and Montreal.  This year, the men are in Montreal and the women are in Toronto.  The total purse for the men is 2.2 million$.  The total purse for the women is 1.34 million$.  It seems to me that regardless of how many sets per match, how many rounds, the gender, etc, it all comes down to generating revenue.  And the men are generating around 62% of the revenue.

So, what Wimbledon is doing is simply not right.  Furthermore, I would imagine that the talent distribution among women is much wider than for men.  So, even if for each tournament the men get 62% of the purse, it’s still likely that the top 5 earners in each sport might earn the same when looking at it over a series of tournaments (though this example is less clear with Roger Federer around).  I imagine that Henin-Hardenne, Sharapova, Mauresmo, and Clijsters are in the final 8 in most tournaments they play in.  I don’t think it’s nearly the case for the men (Federer excepted), like Nadal, Roddick and Davydenko.  This would mean that because the men are less likely to finish in the big money, they get a smaller portion of a bigger pie compared to the women, leaving them with the same total earnings.  But, that’s just a theory.

The 62/38 seems to me based on reality.

(9) Comments • 2007/04/26 • Other Sports
Page 1 of 1 pages

Latest...

COMMENTS

May 26 07:27
“Why Kickstarter works”

May 26 03:03
Pete Palmer’s new book: Basic Ball

May 26 01:11
Largest demonstration in Canadian history?

May 25 19:41
What sabermetrics is NOT

May 25 16:59
Howard Stern

May 25 15:12
Do pitcher’s reach back for velocity when needed?

May 25 12:51
Chad Curtis

May 25 11:26
Lack of hustle during a game

May 25 10:58
Rooting for laundry

May 25 02:38
NFLPA lawsuit against collusion

THREADS

April 24, 2007
Should women tennis players get as much as the men?