THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

Filter posts by...

 

Tuesday, June 08, 2010

Should the Nats convert Harper to the OF?

By , 02:26 AM

According to Rizzo, the Nats GM, they are going to convert Harper to the OF so that they can, “...really let him concentrate on the offensive part of the game and let his athleticism take over as an outfielder.”

Now, I don’t know how good Harper is defensively as an MLB prospect.  Obviously many players from high school and college move to the left on the defensive spectrum by the time they get to the majors, for obvious reasons.  Then again, someone has to eventually play SS, C, CF, 2B, etc.

However, I don’t see Harper as a centerfielder, although I could be wrong, so that leaves RF and LF.  In high school and JUCO, he was a catcher, pitcher, and third baseman.  The difference between the defensive value of a corner outfielder and catcher is enormous of course (25 runs or so) and the difference between a third baseman and OF is large as well (12 runs).

If he has any chance to be a major league catcher, shouldn’t they consider him there?  Even if his offense ends up being a lot less than it would be if he plays another position, isn’t it likely worth the extra 25 runs on defense, even including the fact that he’ll play less games at catcher (plus he can perhaps play another position when being rested at catcher)?  And if not C, why not 3B?

The logic that a player is too good offensively to play catcher makes little sense to me.  A player should play catcher if that is his best position, whether he can hit well or not.  A player’s offense and defensive skills, in terms of what position they eventually play in MLB, should be mostly independent.

Consider this alone:  If a player is projected to play corner outfield, can he really be considered a potential superstar coming out of the draft?  Not unless he is projected to hit like Barry Bonds or Babe Ruth (and maybe he is, but I doubt it).  The starting point (-12 runs) is just too low due to the positional disadvantage.  As a corner outfielder, he has to be a very good hitter by the time he gets to the major leagues, just to be major league average overall. 

(36) Comments • 2010/06/10 • SabermetricsFieldingMLB_Management
Page 1 of 1 pages

Latest...

COMMENTS

May 26 07:27
“Why Kickstarter works”

May 26 03:03
Pete Palmer’s new book: Basic Ball

May 26 01:11
Largest demonstration in Canadian history?

May 25 19:41
What sabermetrics is NOT

May 25 16:59
Howard Stern

May 25 15:12
Do pitcher’s reach back for velocity when needed?

May 25 12:51
Chad Curtis

May 25 11:26
Lack of hustle during a game

May 25 10:58
Rooting for laundry

May 25 02:38
NFLPA lawsuit against collusion

THREADS

June 08, 2010
Should the Nats convert Harper to the OF?