THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

Filter posts by...

 

Tuesday, December 07, 2010

Segregation and Inclusion

By Tangotiger, 02:41 PM

Sabremetrics is a niche topic.  It appeals to a tiny group of baseball nuts.  If I want to get my sabre slice of bread, I’ve got focused, dedicated sites for that, like this blog (of which the readers provide the bulk of the content).  At the same time, there are some sites that like their sabremetrics as part of a larger baseball nut menu, like Fangraphs.  Fangraphs includes sabermetric content, within their overall baseball nut content.  Then you have a site like Baseball Primer, that has a limited focus on sabremetrics, but they tag such articles for an easy search.  The sabremetrics postings are still part of the overall set of postings, but one could, very easily, just click the sabremetrics tag, and be presented with only the sabremetric content.  That’s segregation and inclusion.

Kristi brings up espnW.com, which is a women-focused sports site (technically part of a site, since the actual site has as URL: http://espn.go.com/espnw/ ).  From the looks of it, the site is a separate branch, as surely as the MLB, NHL, and NFL sites are all separate-but-equal.  And, just looking at the layout, it’s also clear what they did: they used WordPress or some other blogging software, to further segregate the content as if it’s its own site.  And the only way for ESPN readers to be alerted to content there would be… well, I don’t know.  It doesn’t seem there’s an inclusion process in there, like Baseball Primer has it, that those articles and blog posts are seamlessly integrated with out similar non-gender based articles.

Basically, I applaud the effort to tag the articles and blog posts for their commonality.  If I want to know about the female experience, I know exactly where to go, just as surely I know where to find sabremetric content on Primer.  There’s a club out there for that.  But that club would need to be part of a larger club, the sports club. 

Giving the girls a VIP room is fantastic.  But that VIP room should be surrounded by glass, not walls.  Every blog post in there should somehow find itself to the other blogs under the ESPN banner, as well.  Segregation and inclusion.

(7) Comments • 2010/12/13 • SabermetricsESPN
Page 1 of 1 pages

Latest...

COMMENTS

May 26 07:27
“Why Kickstarter works”

May 26 03:03
Pete Palmer’s new book: Basic Ball

May 26 01:11
Largest demonstration in Canadian history?

May 25 19:41
What sabermetrics is NOT

May 25 16:59
Howard Stern

May 25 15:12
Do pitcher’s reach back for velocity when needed?

May 25 12:51
Chad Curtis

May 25 11:26
Lack of hustle during a game

May 25 10:58
Rooting for laundry

May 25 02:38
NFLPA lawsuit against collusion

THREADS

December 07, 2010
Segregation and Inclusion