THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

Filter posts by...

 

Monday, March 28, 2011

Reader mail of the day: Best Estimate of True Talent

By Tangotiger, 12:35 PM

If I wanted to create a “true-talent” estimate of a past year, how would you suggest weighting the surrounding years? I.e., for 1994 I would weight ‘93 as 3, ‘94 as 5, ‘95 as 3… Or how would I go about answering my own question by analyzing the data?

When we normally do our best estimate for a player’s true talent level, it’s usually based on known past information.  So, today, March 28, 2011, what is Justin Verlander’s true talent level?  And so, we look at his career, we weight the more recent performances higher, we consider his past performance relative to his age, and we come up with a best estimate of his true talent.

We can figure out the weights because we can look at an unbiased measure of his performance, the out-of-sample performance in 2011, and correlate that performance to his past performance (after adjusting appropriately).  We do this historically with all pitchers, and we come up with a weight that basically says to take 4 parts last year, 3 parts the year before that, 2 parts the year before that, and 1 part the year before that (or some other similar scheme).

But, the reader is asking, what if today is July 1, 2014, and with the benefit of hindsight, we ask what is our best estimate of Verlander’s true talent level on July 1, 2011.

Our problem is now we don’t have an unbiased data point to compare against.  Could we simply extend the above scheme and say that the performance in 2011 will be weighted as 4, the performances in 2010 and 2012 (one year before and after) will be weighted as 3, the 2009 and 2013 performances will be weighted as 2, and 2008/2014 will be weighted as 1.  And we adjust for age.  And can we simply apply the standard regression amount based on playing time?

I don’t really have a good answer, and I’d like to hear from the straight arrrows out there on presenting possible frameworks for discussion.

(55) Comments • 2011/06/16 • SabermetricsTalent_Distribution
Page 1 of 1 pages

Latest...

COMMENTS

May 26 07:27
“Why Kickstarter works”

May 26 03:03
Pete Palmer’s new book: Basic Ball

May 26 01:11
Largest demonstration in Canadian history?

May 25 19:41
What sabermetrics is NOT

May 25 16:59
Howard Stern

May 25 15:12
Do pitcher’s reach back for velocity when needed?

May 25 12:51
Chad Curtis

May 25 11:26
Lack of hustle during a game

May 25 10:58
Rooting for laundry

May 25 02:38
NFLPA lawsuit against collusion

THREADS

March 28, 2011
Reader mail of the day: Best Estimate of True Talent