THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

Filter posts by...

 

Thursday, April 15, 2010

Rational exuberance

By Tangotiger, 10:16 AM

The MLBPA strategy has always been to let the owners and GMs create a bubble market.  Irrational exuberance, as Greenspan called the stock market.  Teams having little to no idea how to value players (how to do value fielding?  how do you separate starting from relieving?  how do you compare a catcher to a LF?) and how to value wins.  In absence of some systematic function, and since GMs get flipped fast, it’s short-term gain city.  Daytrading, irrational exuberance.  Teams make offers as if they have a gun pointed to their head.  A game of russian roulette.  (Is that a perjorative term?  I’d think it would have to be, no?)

Well, the GMs got something dangerous: information.  A systematic process.  I played my small part in this.  Fangraphs exploded it for the mainstream.  We know.  But, the players still act as if there’s some sort of conspiracy.  Here’s Benjie Molina:

If I had trouble finding a job after five of my best years, what am I supposed to expect?  You are supposed to get paid for your numbers. But even if I have another good year, I know I cannot expect anything.

Teams did the one thing that the MLBPA bet against: they got smart.  And smart people don’t play russian roulette.  The MLBPA now has to beg for the one thing they could never be sold: revenue sharing between players and teams, just like the NHL and NBA has.  If they don’t get it, it’s very possible that they will end up with a continually smaller portion of an expanding pie.  The MLBPA should ask for a fixed portion of the pie.  It’s the fair way to operate.

The only issue there is the accounting practices of having related-party transactions taking revenue off one book and putting it in another, thereby shielding it from the MLBPA.  That’s a legitimate concern, and one that has been at least tested with the NHL and NBA.  I’d like to hear what those unions think of those arrangements.

Oh, and you’ll have to teach them about escrow too, because a good portion of NHL players are clueless about that.

(4) Comments • 2010/04/17 • SabermetricsFinancesMLB_Management
Page 1 of 1 pages

Latest...

COMMENTS

May 26 07:27
“Why Kickstarter works”

May 26 03:03
Pete Palmer’s new book: Basic Ball

May 26 01:11
Largest demonstration in Canadian history?

May 25 19:41
What sabermetrics is NOT

May 25 16:59
Howard Stern

May 25 15:12
Do pitcher’s reach back for velocity when needed?

May 25 12:51
Chad Curtis

May 25 11:26
Lack of hustle during a game

May 25 10:58
Rooting for laundry

May 25 02:38
NFLPA lawsuit against collusion

THREADS

April 15, 2010
Rational exuberance