Tuesday, May 10, 2011
Poker is a game of skill, not luck
So speaks Levitt.
I’m not crazy about his baseball analogy. But, it seems obvious to me that there is a skill component to poker, that it’s not just random. It’s human v human, and you can bluff.
This is unlike blackjack, unless card-counting is also a skill. Otherwise, you bet by rote.
So, explain to us the legal implications here? That if it’s a game of skill, then it’s not gambling? If it was pure luck / random, then it is gambling?
But I also seem to remember that those office pools (10 x 10 super bowl grids) were deemed not gambling because it was all luck.
I’m not up on all this, so maybe someone will shed some light…
UPDATE: Levitt’s paper (pdf).


Recent comments
Older comments
Page 1 of 344 pages 1 2 3 > Last »Complete Archive – By Category
Complete Archive – By Date