THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

Filter posts by...

 

Friday, June 24, 2011

Platoon advantage by time of day

By Tangotiger, 11:18 AM

Interesting

Results indicate that players who were “morning types” had a higher batting average (.267) than players who were “evening types” (.259) in early games that started before 2 p.m. However, evening types had a higher batting average (.261) than morning types (.252) in mid-day games that started between 2 p.m. and 7:59 p.m. This advantage for evening types persisted and was strongest in late games that began at 8 p.m. or later, when evening types had a .306 batting average and morning types maintained a .252 average.

“Our data, though not statistically significant due to low subject numbers, clearly shows a trend toward morning-type batters hitting progressively worse as the day becomes later, and the evening-types showing the opposite trend,” said principal investigator and lead author Dr. W. Christopher Winter, medical director of the Martha Jefferson Hospital Sleep Medicine Center in Charlottesville, Va.

...but obviously the sample size is so tiny, that the “though not statistically significant” can’t just be walked by.

This is their sample size:

Nine participants were found to be evening types, and seven were morning types. Both groups had a mean age of 29 years. The study used the players’ statistics from the 2009 and 2010 seasons, which allowed for the analysis of 2,149 innings from early games, 4,550 innings from mid-day games and 750 innings from late games.

Reporting the innings played inflates the impact of the size of the sample, given that they are reporting batting averages (which means the opportunities is at bats, not innings).  So, 2149 innings is like 1000 at bats, and 750 innings is like 350 at bats.  Laughably small numbers of course. And next time, please, don’t use batting average.  Linear Weights or wOBA would have been the far better choice.

However, I very much like the idea, and the effort.  So, as a starting point, it’s great.

Glove-slap: Sky.

(14) Comments • 2011/07/19 • SabermetricsStatistical_Theory
Page 1 of 1 pages

Latest...

COMMENTS

May 26 03:03
Pete Palmer’s new book: Basic Ball

May 26 01:11
Largest demonstration in Canadian history?

May 25 23:40
“Why Kickstarter works”

May 25 19:41
What sabermetrics is NOT

May 25 16:59
Howard Stern

May 25 15:12
Do pitcher’s reach back for velocity when needed?

May 25 12:51
Chad Curtis

May 25 11:26
Lack of hustle during a game

May 25 10:58
Rooting for laundry

May 25 02:38
NFLPA lawsuit against collusion

THREADS

June 24, 2011
Platoon advantage by time of day