THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews
If you are a media member and would like a review copy of The Book, please contact Kevin Cuddihy of Potomac Books.

Buy The Book from Amazon

MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

Filter posts by...

 

Tuesday, November 20, 2007

Going for extra bases, Retrosheet Years

By Tangotiger, 12:51 PM

Want to know how times have changed, how often runners go for the extra base on a hit?  Here you go.

To read the first line: when a single is hit, with a runner on 1B, between 1957 and 1968, with 0 outs, the runner will go for the extra base 36% of the time, and he will be successful 95% of the time.  This compares to the 1993-present numbers of 27% and 96%.  The gap widens with 1 out (39% attempt, against 30% attempt), and shrinks alot with 2 outs (40% to 36%).  The 1957-1968 was definitely more aggressive, as they ran just as hard with 1 out as with 2 outs, which is not necessarily a good idea.

The same pattern repeats with the runner on 2B.  With 2 outs, there’s not much distinguishing a runner’s aggressiveness over the years.  But, at 0 and 1 out, runners today are far more passive.  There’s nothing necessarily wrong with that, since far more runs score today, making the breakeven point higher today (outs are costlier).

On the flip side, a double, with a runner on 1B, has not changed the aggressiveness of the baserunner.

At some point, soon I hope, I’ll break down these numbers by baserunner.

I’ll also point out the obvious:

Read More

(10) Comments • 2007/11/24 • SabermetricsBaserunning
Page 1 of 1 pages