THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

Filter posts by...

 

Tuesday, June 08, 2010

Game theory on 3-2 counts

By Tangotiger, 10:44 AM

David in a fascinating piece:

If you do the math, you find that hitters want to swing 74.5 percent of the time, which makes sense since pitchers will obviously just about always want to throw a strike given the high cost of throwing a ball when the batter is taking. In fact, hitters swing 73.2 percent of the time in 3-2 counts, which is just about what game theory would predict.
...
Do the math and you find that pitchers want to throw a strike 89.8 percent of the time. In actuality, however, they throw strikes on only 59.2 percent of their 3-2 pitches. Again, the hitters confirm our model’s predictions while the pitchers do not! What is going on?

My issue here is with his chart:

If the pitcher threw a strike and the batter went after it, for example, the hitter ended up with a .330 wOBA, on average. If the hitter didn’t offer, his wOBA was just .273. If the pitcher threw a ball and the hitter nonetheless took a swing, his wOBA was really pitiful—.188—but if he kept his bat on his shoulder, it was a hefty .688.

First, I don’t know how the wOBA can be .273 on strikes that the batter takes.  It should be .000 (a strikeout).  The wOBA on balls that that the batter takes should be close to .700, and it is (a walk). 

When he’s working out his probabilities to get to the equilibrium point, he’s using these numbers as fixed.  Well, the .188 wOBA on balls out of the strike zone that the hitter swings at is based on his expectation that the ball might be close to the strike zone.  And similarly, his .330 wOBA on swings at pitches in the strike zone is based on his expectation of a decent pitch.

However, what happens if, as David’s model suggests, that the batter will take every pitch?  The pitcher will throw easy strikes, and on the rare occasions that he doesn’t take, his wOBA on swings at pitches in the strike zone will be say .500.

So, unless I’m not following along correctly, we need a model that will float the values of the swings based on the ball/strike frequency.

Love this stuff.

(8) Comments • 2012/02/15 • SabermetricsBatter_v_PitcherIn-game_Strategy
Page 1 of 1 pages

Latest...

COMMENTS

May 25 19:41
What sabermetrics is NOT

May 25 19:41
Pete Palmer’s new book: Basic Ball

May 25 19:38
“Why Kickstarter works”

May 25 17:32
Largest demonstration in Canadian history?

May 25 16:59
Howard Stern

May 25 15:12
Do pitcher’s reach back for velocity when needed?

May 25 12:51
Chad Curtis

May 25 11:26
Lack of hustle during a game

May 25 10:58
Rooting for laundry

May 25 02:38
NFLPA lawsuit against collusion

THREADS

June 08, 2010
Game theory on 3-2 counts