THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

Filter posts by...

 

Wednesday, May 04, 2011

Game Score-ing Liriano’s No-hitter

By Tangotiger, 09:31 AM

Last year, I proposed four different Game Score metrics.  Each one focused on a particular subset of a pitcher’s game results.  A score of 40 is meant to be replacement level, 50 is meant to be average, and 100 is meant to be “the best”.

The first one focused just on runs allowed:
GameScore = 7 * IP - 10 * R + 40
So for Liriano’s 9-inning shutout (really, anyone’s shutout), the game score is 103.

The second one focused only on K and BB:
GameScore = 3 * (SO-BB) + 40
If you had a 20K, 0BB performance, that’s 100.  But, that’s not what Liriano had last night.  Oh no.  He had 6 BB and 2 K (to go along with only 66 strikes and 57 balls).  So, he ends up with a game score of 28, which is pretty crappy.

The third one focused on FIP:
GameScore = -13 * HR -3 * BB + 2 * SO + 3 * IP + 33
Liriano gets his -18 for walks, +4 for K, +27 for IP, and 33 for a total of 46.

The fourth one was LWTS-based:
GameScore = -8 * HR -5 * H -3 * BB + 9 * IP -2
So, Liriano gets a 61.

So, based on your perspective to the game, he either had a 103, 61, 46, 28.  That’s quite untelling… and telling.  Basically, that kind of spread is what you’d call “an ugly win”.  There’s no reason that we’d take the simple average of those.  You could of course weight the runs method far more than the K/BB method.  The simple average of those 4 is 60.

Along the lines of the simple average, but just trying to get some nice round numbers, the above 4 methods becomes this:
GameScore
= 40
+ 4.5 * IP (<-- coefficient changes based on run environment)
+ 1 * SO
- 1 * H
- 2 * BB
- 2 * R
- 5 * HR

So for Liriano, he starts with 40, and you add in 41 for his complete game, add 2 for his strikeouts, and subtract 12 for his walks.  That gives you 71.  (Bill James’ version says 83.)

Really, in order to figure out the “proper” weight, you, as a person, need to find these “ugly” type of games, where one method says one high score, and another method says another high score.  And then you come up with your personalized weighting scheme.  You don’t need me to tell you how to appreciate the game you just watched.

(11) Comments • 2011/05/05 • SabermetricsPitchers
Page 1 of 1 pages

Latest...

COMMENTS

May 25 19:41
What sabermetrics is NOT

May 25 19:41
Pete Palmer’s new book: Basic Ball

May 25 19:38
“Why Kickstarter works”

May 25 17:32
Largest demonstration in Canadian history?

May 25 16:59
Howard Stern

May 25 15:12
Do pitcher’s reach back for velocity when needed?

May 25 12:51
Chad Curtis

May 25 11:26
Lack of hustle during a game

May 25 10:58
Rooting for laundry

May 25 02:38
NFLPA lawsuit against collusion

THREADS

May 04, 2011
Game Score-ing Liriano’s No-hitter