THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

Filter posts by...

 

Sunday, December 04, 2011

Fighting in the NHL

By Tangotiger, 12:08 PM

There is one school of thought that having stronger penalties for fighting in the NHL will simply shift the infraction into something else, like stick fouls.  And rather than fighting be a “red light district” limited in large part to a few players, the stick fouls, or whatever other aggressive fouls that will take its place, will then be distributed across a much larger group of players. In effect, the enforcers act as a few policemen to prevent anarchy.

The other school of thought is that the idea of fighting is barbaric, and it should be accompanied with harsh penalties.  And, if, and when, the unintended consequences rear its ugly head, then we’ll deal with it then.  That it’s more important to get on the right path, then to try to have this balance of terror in perpetuity.

***

What is also interesting is that by giving prominence to fighting, those fighters have to come from somewhere.  And, as we can see in this powerful account of Derek Boogaard, it starts at a young age.  We are, basically, growing enforcers from the outset.  It is one thing for a good hockey player to have to defend himself in the course of a physical confrontation.  And it’s another thing to cultivate an enforcer simply for his raison d’etre.

So, removing fighting may have an unintended consequence of stick fouls (and those may be even more dangerous than fighting), but it will have the intended consequence of no longer promoting, and thereby no longer needing to cultivate, fighting.

I think the players are smart enough, experience enough, that if challenged to create a climate, via the rule book, that eliminates fighting, and reduce unintended consequences, they’d be able to do that.  And, I think having Brendan Shanahan head up, or appoint, a committee to that effect may have some fantastic results.

If you convince yourself that things can’t be better than it is, then you assure yourself that they won’t be.  But, if you allow the possibility that things can get better, then you’ve opened up the door to a chance that it will get better.

(9) Comments • 2011/12/05 • Other SportsHockey
Page 1 of 1 pages

Latest...

COMMENTS

May 25 19:41
What sabermetrics is NOT

May 25 19:41
Pete Palmer’s new book: Basic Ball

May 25 19:38
“Why Kickstarter works”

May 25 17:32
Largest demonstration in Canadian history?

May 25 16:59
Howard Stern

May 25 15:12
Do pitcher’s reach back for velocity when needed?

May 25 12:51
Chad Curtis

May 25 11:26
Lack of hustle during a game

May 25 10:58
Rooting for laundry

May 25 02:38
NFLPA lawsuit against collusion

THREADS

December 04, 2011
Fighting in the NHL