THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

Filter posts by...

 

Thursday, August 20, 2009

Educating a fan on… reliever impact

By Tangotiger, 10:31 AM

A fan said this:

No matter how you look at the math, the closer never comes close in value.

I would not use the numbers I’m about to present as-is (they require adjustments and change in baselines), but as a first step, Eric Gagne in 2003 is in the discussion:

WPA
+5.6 Gagne
+5.4 Pedro
+5.2 Halladay (that guy’s always in the discussion)
+4.9 Loaiza
+4.5 Schmidt
+4.2 Donnelly
+4.1 Wagner
+4.1 Prior

As I said, you have to change the baseline to something other than average, and you have to change the leverage aspect to realize that the reliever should only get partial credit for it.  How do you do the adjustments? 

First figure the LI of each pitcher.  Starters are usually very close to 1, so you might as well leave them be.  For Gagne, he had an LI of 1.8.  We give him credit for 1.4 (halfway between the LI he found himself in and the average… we do that because we credit him for having the talent to leverage the situation, but realizing that if he wasn’t there, someone else, worse than him, would be there anyway… it’s a way to approximate the chaining effect).  So, his 5.6 WPA, based on 1.8 LI, is worth 4.3 on 1.4 LI. 

The replacement level for a reliever is .030 wins per 9 IP below average.  So, you give every reliever that much, times his adjusted LI.  For Gagne, we add +0.8 wins times 1.4, or +1.1 wins.  That gives us an adjusted and rebaselined WPA of 5.4 WAR.

For starters, the replacement level is .120 wins per 9 IP below average.  So, you give each starter that much more.  For your typical workhorse starters of 210 IP (pretty much what Prior and Schmidt got), that adds 2.8 wins.  That puts those guys at around 7 WAR.

So, I would not say that an ace reliever never comes close in value.  But, he’s got a huge hill to overcome, that’s for sure.

FWIW, the way Fangraphs calculates WAR has Prior at 7.6, Schmidt at 6.7, and Gagne at 4.5.

Glove-slap: Repoz.

(10) Comments • 2009/08/20 • SabermetricsLeverage_Index
Page 1 of 1 pages

Latest...

COMMENTS

May 25 17:39
“Why Kickstarter works”

May 25 17:32
Largest demonstration in Canadian history?

May 25 16:59
Howard Stern

May 25 16:43
Pete Palmer’s new book: Basic Ball

May 25 16:31
What sabermetrics is NOT

May 25 15:12
Do pitcher’s reach back for velocity when needed?

May 25 12:51
Chad Curtis

May 25 11:26
Lack of hustle during a game

May 25 10:58
Rooting for laundry

May 25 02:38
NFLPA lawsuit against collusion

THREADS

August 20, 2009
Educating a fan on… reliever impact