THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

<< Back to main

Wednesday, June 03, 2009

You’re going to take that shot to the head, AND you are going to like it!

By Tangotiger, 01:08 PM

That is my paraphrase of Brian Burke, GM of the Maple Leafs, and easily one of the most influential executives in the NHL in resonpose to this presentation from the NHLPA:

The majority of NHL players are more worried about receiving a shoulder to the head than a punch to the face. And the level of concern is strong enough that the NHL Players’ Association believes the league should adopt a rule that penalizes deliberate shots to the head.

NHLPA executive director Paul Kelly delivered that message to the league’s general managers as they kicked off their annual meetings Monday. He would like referees to have the option of handing out a minor, major or match penalty to players that “intentionally or recklessly” target the head of an opponent.

“That’s probably the most significant concern on the part of players,” Kelly said after addressing the GMs for an hour. “I would say better than three-quarters believe that we need to have a new rule on hits to the head, that protects players.  “We’re looking for not all hits to the head—there are accidental and inadvertent hits that don’t cause a great deal of injury.”

Burke said this in response:

A number of GMs are concerned it will take physical play out of the game. Told the players intend to fight for a new rule on headshots at the competition committee, Toronto GM Brian Burke dismissed it.

“They can bring that fight for it if they want. There is no appetite in this group. None whatsoever,” said Burke.

Is that god-damn incredible?  This is purely a workplace safety issue… between the workers themselves!  Why in the world does the owner have any say here?  Indeed, the NHLPA itself can easily come in and put in their own bylaws and fines in place, rather than handing out the security and enforcement to the NHL and its referees.  It would be better if the NHLPA doesn’t do it, for the obvious conflict of interest.  They could contract out a third party to do it.  That’s why the NHL itself would be the ideal justice here. 

And the owners are saying no!  They don’t want to reduce the physical play at all, even if it means virtually eliminating head shots. 


#1          (see all posts) 2009/06/03 (Wed) @ 14:32

The NHL has been run by clowns for almost 20 years. How many years has it been since Gil Stein took over for John Ziegler? That the league is still in business is a testament to the greatness of the game itself.


#2          (see all posts) 2009/06/03 (Wed) @ 15:08

I wonder if Ron Wilson would agree.  He ragged on one of the Leafs’ D (Finger?) for not wearing a visor after Finger took a puck in the face and missed 7 minutes to get stitches.  Burke will be opposed to head shots until one of his players gets hurt.


#3    JD      (see all posts) 2009/06/03 (Wed) @ 15:33

Is it wrong that I hope Burke gets hit upside the head a few (hundred) times? Such blatant macho meatball sophomoric stupidity bugs me.

People like Burke are what keeps hockey from being more popular.


#4    Tangotiger      (see all posts) 2009/06/03 (Wed) @ 15:58

Good idea.  I would like the GM meetings to be broadcast, and I am pretty sure we won’t be seeing any shots to the head:

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0094226/quotes

Capone: A man becomes preeminent, he’s expected to have enthusiasms. Enthusiasms, enthusiasms… What are mine? What draws my admiration? What is that which gives me joy? Baseball! A man stands alone at the plate. This is the time for what? For individual achievement. There he stands alone. But in the field, what? Part of a team. Teamwork… Looks, throws, catches, hustles. Part of one big team. Bats himself the live-long day, Babe Ruth, Ty Cobb, and so on. If his team don’t field… what is he? You follow me? No one. Sunny day, the stands are full of fans. What does he have to say? I’m goin’ out there for myself. But… I get nowhere unless the team wins.
Hoods: Team!
[Capone beats one of the men to death with a baseball bat]


#5    salb918      (see all posts) 2009/06/03 (Wed) @ 16:34

http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/dorkapalooza-2009-the-sports-analytics-conference-at-mit/

Speaking on a panel discussing the fan experience, Burke’s comments centered around the theme that his job is to entertain consumers of the Maple Leafs. He understands that he’s competing with vacations, new cars, and the Canadian Football League. To that end, he believes that marquee and high-skill players have intrinsic value, and that contact and fighting on the ice will encourage fans to come back for more.

I agree that it is a workplace safety issue to be decided between the players.  But it’s not so amazing that Burke opposes this, is it?

However, management *does* have an interest.  Burke believes, falsely or not, that the behavior of his players affects his revenue.  So when the players decide to unilaterally police their behavior in a way that will impact his revenue, then he’s miffed.

If I go to Wal-Mart and find two employees punching each other, few people, if any, would be more likely to shop there.  In that case, the interests of the management (maximize profit) are aligned with the interests of the labor (workplace safety).  In the NHL case, they are not aligned, and so harrumphing ensues.


#6    Tangotiger      (see all posts) 2009/06/03 (Wed) @ 16:56

If the players all agree that shots to the head is not an “assumed risk” of the activity, then if the owners do not set up controls to prevent or minimize it, I have to believe they are then liable for any head shots, wouldn’t they?

It is really irrelevant if there is a revenue impact.  After all, every safety measure in every workplace is an expense of some form, isn’t it?


#7    salb918      (see all posts) 2009/06/03 (Wed) @ 17:30

It is really irrelevant if there is a revenue impact.  After all, every safety measure in every workplace is an expense of some form, isn’t it?

Well, sure.  Businesses can be made to assume those expenses, but they are usually released of some liability as a result.  This can save them money in the long run by minimizing lawsuits brought against them.  So, if an NHLPA wants to sue management in order to bring them in line, I have to believe that’s an option.  But given the NHL’s difficulties over the last few years, I can’t imagine it’s a realistic one.


#8    nightfly      (see all posts) 2009/06/04 (Thu) @ 11:01

Burke really should know better.  The game is plenty physical anyway, and making the hits clean won’t change that.  After the ‘94 season, when the game clogged up, there was plenty of hitting but popularity sagged because nobody could create any offense.  During the 80’s when scoring was highest, there was still plenty of hitting, guys would drop the gloves, and the game was very popular.

No matter what he says, I’m not so sure that other GMs (or any owners) around the league are so eager to see their marquee players crippled.  The game is physical enough without head-hunting.  He may just be worried that it takes too much control over the game away from the players and hands it to the refs.  Whenever officials start to think they’re the show (think Angel Hernandez, or half of the NBA’s zebras) it’s bad news for all concerned.  If that’s the case, he could have been a lot more tactful about what he said.

You also have to understand, being GM of the Maple Leafs is sort of like being the NHL’s George Steinbrenner.  In baseball, everyone is rumored to be going to the Yankees; in hockey, it’s the Leafs.  Same thing.  If the GM of the Columbus Blue Jackets said something like this most folks would never know it.  Heck, if Burke had said this while he was still in Anaheim, it wouldn’t get this much play.  Montreal has the dynasty but much of the hockey media comes out of TO; whatever is said there tends to drive the narrative, even if it’s complete rubbish.


Page 1 of 1 pages


Name (required)
E-Mail (optional; WILL be published)
Website (optional)

<< Back to main


Latest...

COMMENTS

May 25 15:37
What sabermetrics is NOT

May 25 15:28
Largest demonstration in Canadian history?

May 25 15:12
Do pitcher’s reach back for velocity when needed?

May 25 15:02
Pete Palmer’s new book: Basic Ball

May 25 13:04
“Why Kickstarter works”

May 25 12:51
Chad Curtis

May 25 11:32
Howard Stern

May 25 11:26
Lack of hustle during a game

May 25 10:58
Rooting for laundry

May 25 02:38
NFLPA lawsuit against collusion