THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews
If you are a media member and would like a review copy of The Book, please contact Kevin Cuddihy of Potomac Books.

Buy The Book from Amazon

MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

<< Back to main

Tuesday, April 17, 2007

Who is the new Manny Ramirez?

By Tangotiger, 11:40 AM

A few years ago, the Redsox tried to unload Manny Ramirez.  And their asking price was fairly low: nothing.  Just take him.  And no one did.  Why is that?  If you buy a house for 2 million$ all on mortgage, and then the market tanked, and the same house across the street can be bought for 1 million$, you’d be ecstatic if someone else would take over the debt.  You wouldn’t say “Hey, here’s a 1 million$ house!  For free!”.  No, the buyer would actually need to take over the mortgage too.  And why would he do that, if he can buy the house across the street at half price?

These days however, inflation has caught up with Manny, and Manny’s true talent level has not suffered the expected decline.  If Manny were to be released, there are teams that would gladly pick him up.  What about today?  Whose contract is so out-of-whack with the market, that if the player was released, not a single team would bite.  Who is the new Manny? 

Dave gives us his list over at USSM.  My first thought was Carlos Lee, who I had pegged as signing a free agent contract that was 50 million$ more than he could deliver (the direct opposite of Chase Utley).  Later in the comments though, Dave makes an interesting point that there actually might be another team that would have similarly overvalued him.  That is, in a market where a 1 million$ house carries a 2 million$ mortgage, there might have actually been two teams crazy enough to buy that house.  But, you might be able to say the same about Meche and Zito, so I would probably have said “no recent free agents” for the list.

So, the question is: who do you think is the new Manny?  How much cash would you have to send along with the player, for someone to take over the contract?


#1    Chris      (see all posts) 2007/04/17 (Tue) @ 12:26

Maybe it’s just me, but Todd Helton seems like an obvious choice.
He’s still a productive hitter, just as Manny was two years ago, but he’s a 33-year-old first baseman. There’s a significant chance that he won’t be productive enough to justify even half of the salary he will be collecting by 2011. I like Helton, but if I were a GM I wouldn’t touch that contract.


#2    tangotiger      (see all posts) 2007/04/17 (Tue) @ 15:21

Fun read from Manny here, including this gem
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/04/23/070423fa_fact_mcgrath?printable=true

“I said, ‘Manny, let me ask you something. I was just wondering why you get back in the batter’s box after ball four.’ He said, ‘I don’t keep track of the balls.’ He said, ‘I don’t keep track of the strikes, either, until I got two.’ Then he said, ‘Duke, I’m up there looking for a pitch I can hit. If I don’t get it, I wait for the umpire to tell me to go to first. Isn’t that what you’re paying me to do?’ ”
...
In 2003, [Bill] James identified fifty-three instances in which Red Sox players had demonstrated a game-altering failure to hustle; twenty-nine of them involved Ramirez. He also concluded that Ramirez was the team’s second-sloppiest fielder. (A Times column last month underscored this point, quoting an analyst who said, “Manny is at the far end of the as-bad-as-you-can-get-in-the-field spectrum.”) In theory, playing defense and hustling are also things that he is paid to do, and in the fall of 2003 the new management, convinced that Ramirez’s twenty-million-dollar salary was an albatross, placed their best hitter on irrevocable waivers, asking nothing in return for any team’s willingness simply to take him (and his contract) off their hands.

His I-dont-care-about-the-count approach is similar to the anecdote of Beane and Dykstra in Moneyball.  Whereas Beane tried to outhink the pitcher, Dykstra just waited for his pitch.  While I’d like to think that the batter should be more aware of the data, it’s likely probable that there’s a group of players in which it wouldn’t help at all.


#3    David Smyth      (see all posts) 2007/04/17 (Tue) @ 19:18

I’m skeptical of the ‘Manny didn’t hustle’ stuff, although I hardly ever see him play. Some players are sort of awkward and slow, and give such an impression. Another one is his namesake, Aramis Ramirez, who I see play over 100 times per year.

As far as Manny’s comment about not paying attention to the count until there is 2 strikes---if you read what he said closely, it does not equate to lack of discipline, in any way.


#4          (see all posts) 2007/04/17 (Tue) @ 21:24

David:  I agree.  I think the “Manny hustle” thing is overrated.  And speaking of LF in Boston.  I was watching the Angel/Sox game live yesterday when the “Pizza Incident” happened.  Jerry Remy (Bosox announcer) is hilarious.  Here’s a link to the NESN broadcast and it’s FUNNY.


#5          (see all posts) 2007/04/17 (Tue) @ 21:27

Whoops; no link above!  Here it is:

http://www.deadspin.com/sports/baseball/some-morning-fun-time-at-fenway-park-252856.php


#6    tangotiger      (see all posts) 2007/04/17 (Tue) @ 22:17

David, I did not take it as lack of discipline at all.  It’s simply his approach.  Though, I have to believe he knows when it’s a 3-0 count.  Then again, he swings at 12% of his 3-0 counts, while the MLB average is 5%, according to b-r.com (I seem to remember the league average was around 9%… maybe I’m thinking of something else).

http://www.baseball-reference.com/r/ramirma02.shtml


#7    Rally      (see all posts) 2007/04/18 (Wed) @ 09:28

When Manny puts the ball in play on 3-0, he hits .474 with an .895 SLG.  I think he knows what he’s doing.  I see MGL started a thread on hitting 3-0.  Its certainly something you need to do now and then to keep the pitcher honest.

Can we tell how often he swings 3-0 from B-Ref though?  If he fouls it off, it just goes into the 3-1 box, but maybe I’m not looking in the right place.  B-ref makes improvements faster than I can learn how to use them.


#8    tangotiger      (see all posts) 2007/04/18 (Wed) @ 10:16

On the “after 3-0”, which means what happens in his eventual PA once he’s at 3-0, he’s 381/842/698.  This includes a sh-tload of IBB.  If we remove those, his OBP goes down to 791.

The league average is 296/725/496:
http://www.insidethebook.com/ee/index.php/site/comments/hitting_by_count/

Overall, Manny’s OBP is about 70 points above league average, and his OBP on 3-0 has also around the same gap.  Overall, Manny’s SLG is almost 200 points above league average, and his SLG on 3-0 has a similar gap.

For someone who doesn’t (consciously) know the count, he certainly performs like he does.


#9    MGL      (see all posts) 2007/04/18 (Wed) @ 13:21

Even before your calcs, I seriously doubted that Manny did not know the count while batting.  It is not possible to be that successful without knowing the count.  Think of it this way.  If Manny didn’t know the count and could hit as he does, what would we hit if he paid attention to the count?


Page 1 of 1 pages


Name (required)
E-Mail (optional)
Website (optional)

<< Back to main


Latest...

COMMENTS

Jan 09 16:41
Sabermetric Moves of the 2009 Pre-Season

Jan 09 19:56
Modeling Baseball Player Ability with a Nested Dirichlet Distribution

Jan 09 18:08
Line Drives

Jan 09 18:04
Challenging Nate Silver (and all other forecasters)

Jan 09 17:31
Cheers

Jan 09 17:14
Teaching sabermetrics at school

Jan 09 16:51
The first Hardball Times Annual available for download!

Jan 09 14:44
Vote for the Worst Player in MLB

Jan 09 12:29
Clint Eastwood is Archie Bunker

Jan 09 12:16
Mailbags on Parade