THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

<< Back to main

Thursday, December 08, 2011

Where have the Scot Shields of the world gone?

By Tangotiger, 03:58 PM

This is the number of relievers that have faced more than 400 batters, by season.  We see that through 1989, there was an average of between half and one pitcher who faced that many batters per team.

From 1990-1999, that number was cut substantially.  It was cut even further from 2000-2006. 

And, since 2007, no reliever has faced more than 400 batters. 

2004 was the last season that the true relief-warrior was used in a meaningful role.  Scot Shields faced a whopping 454 batters, on his way to a fine career with the Angels.

1974    16
1975    15
1976    22
1977    28
1978    24
1979    16
1980    27
1981    1
1982    24
1983    27
1984    23
1985    22
1986    23
1987    24
1988    15
1989    18

1990    8
1991    10
1992    9
1993    7
1994    0
1995    5
1996    5
1997    7
1998    5
1999    11

2000    3
2001    2
2002    1
2003    3
2004    3
2005    0
2006    2

2007    0
2008    0
2009    0
2010    0
2011    0


#1          (see all posts) 2011/12/09 (Fri) @ 21:45

Earl Weaver said about starters that it’s easier to find four good ones than five. There’s some corollary of that for relievers too.  The trend is for more relievers, and not using your best relievers as much as they can take it, and not just the closers. It doesn’t make a whole lot of sense to me, either. Wouldn’t it make more sense to have the closer, a setup man whom you plan to have face 400+ guys over a year, the LOOGY, and then a couple of swing men and maybe another specialist reliever?

It even makes the game more watchable since you don’t have all this switching to crappy pitchers just to get them work.


#2    Dana King      (see all posts) 2011/12/09 (Fri) @ 22:22

Charles,
I agree completely. I know how often the team with the lead after seven or eight innings wins the game, but I wonder how many game are lost each year because an inferior pitcher was brought in with the bases loaded and one out in the seventh while the closer--supposedly their best reliever--never got a chance to pitch, or was being saved to pitch one inning with no one on and a three run lead.


Page 1 of 1 pages


Name (required)
E-Mail (optional; WILL be published)
Website (optional)

<< Back to main


Latest...

COMMENTS

May 25 15:37
What sabermetrics is NOT

May 25 15:28
Largest demonstration in Canadian history?

May 25 15:12
Do pitcher’s reach back for velocity when needed?

May 25 15:02
Pete Palmer’s new book: Basic Ball

May 25 13:04
“Why Kickstarter works”

May 25 12:51
Chad Curtis

May 25 11:32
Howard Stern

May 25 11:26
Lack of hustle during a game

May 25 10:58
Rooting for laundry

May 25 02:38
NFLPA lawsuit against collusion