Wednesday, November 15, 2006
Vote for the Worst Player in MLB
UPDATE: Nov 15, 2006
Congratulations, Willie F. Bloomquist!
Hardcore fans have seen through your .257 career batting average, and focused on your .312 OBP and extremely ugly .329 SLG. You can’t even bunt very well (.250 average, which hardly compares to the league leader, Ichiro, at .475, or a crop of decent bunters in the .300-.350 range). While you know how to steal a base (50 for 58), and are adequate on the field with the glove, you are the epitomy of a replacement-level player. You also saved yourself too much embarrassment by performing well in the clutch. But, we don’t expect that to last.
You have come to bat 1000 times already, and played the field an equivalent 250 full games. You’ve played practically every position on the field, so that we would be spared being given an indelible impression for too long. Even Robert Downey Jr envies the number of chances you’ve been given. It’s time for the Mariners brass, and all of MLB, to see you for what you are: the 750th best player in baseball. Angel Berroa and Cristian Guzman thank you.
Original: Nov 8, 2006
Too tough of a vote.
Bloomquist career OPS+: 79
Berroa career OPS+: 78
Borchard career OPS+: 67
Freeman career OPS+: 55
Niekro career OPS+: 85
Phillips career OPS+: 71
But then you have to take position into account. Which is worse: A guy who can play many positions poorly (Bloomquist), a guy who can’t play any positions (Phillips), or a guy whose defense at the most important defensive position is awful (Berroa)?
Then you have to balance true awfulness with failing to meet expectations? Berroa won ROY, Freeman and Borchard were high draft picks with large signing bonuses. But does that make them worse? Probably not.
I voted for Berroa, but Phillips and Niekro (who is at least good with the glove at 1B) were also considered.