THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews
If you are a media member and would like a review copy of The Book, please contact Kevin Cuddihy of Potomac Books.

Buy The Book from Amazon

MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

<< Back to main

Friday, August 25, 2006

The Shift

By , 08:29 AM

When Bonds was Bonds the shift probably did not hurt him all that much overall, or at least the decrease in production from the shift was but a mere drop in the bucket compared to his overall offensive production.

Now that he is no longer Bonds, I am beginning to wonder if the shift is really hurting his overall offensive value.


Most players hit ground balls to the pull side 75 to 80% of the time, IIRC.  It would probably be correct for the defense to shift on them as well, if not for one thing.  They could then lay down a bunt or intentionally try and hit a ground ball to the opposite side enough of the time to render the shift ineffective.

What about Bonds?  Can he not bunt or hit to the opposite side enough of the time to thwart the shift, or is it not “manly” to do so?  I suspect the latter.  He would only need to do so until they stopped shifting and then go back to his regular hitting style.

His BA is just too low for someone with a great batting eye and someone who swings so hard when he gets a good pitch to hit.  I suspect that the shift is really hurting his production and that he could do something about it if he wanted to.

#1    tangotiger      (see all posts) 2006/08/25 (Fri) @ 08:54

I’m looking at his hitting spray on MLB.com for 2004 and 2006.

In 2004, the majority of his groundball outs are on the pull side, though there are several also on the opposite-field.  His singles also show a similar tendency, though with a better spray pattern.  I don’t see that much of a difference when I look at the 2006 spray chart.

I’m not sure it’s really in his best interests to change his hitting style.

He also happens to have a WPA of +3.2 (of which +0.7 of that is clutchiness).  Being +2.5 wins otherwise, above average, in half-a-season, is still great!  I’m sure that’s easily top 20.

His performance with runners on base is tremendous.  His BB/K rate is 36:28 with bases empty, but 63:13 with men on base.  His wOBA is .350 and .500, respectively, with about 200 PA in each situation, which is a spread of over 4 SD.

I wouldn’t be surprised if such a smart hitter is already actively altering approach, but continuing to pull the ball as he does.

In short, my rule of thumb is: if you have a great hitter or a great pitcher, let them work it out.


#2    tangotiger      (see all posts) 2006/08/25 (Fri) @ 08:57

Hmmm… I see he has 36 IBB, which if we take it out of the runners on line, leaves him with a BB/K ratio of 27:13, which is still great, but not as shocking.

This could very well be a situation where pitchers still pitch to him differently with men on base, and are far more confident with him with bases empty.

If he were to alter his hitting approach, I would certainly only do it with bases empty.


#3    john      (see all posts) 2006/08/25 (Fri) @ 09:52

I was kinda wondering this about delgado.  His power numbers are fine but his batting average is low....seems like he hits an awful lot of balls right into the shift.


#4    Ryan      (see all posts) 2006/08/25 (Fri) @ 10:54

The same with Ortiz, earlier this season his BA was pretty low and A LOT of his would-be hits were taken away by the shifts [to the point where it was a mental thing]. Has anyone seen what Joe Maddon does to him? 4 OFers and no IFers on the left side.

To his credit, he has started to drop down some nice bunts when shifts are on in the early innings. And now he just hits everything where the shifts aren’t… in the stands.


#5    MGL      (see all posts) 2006/08/25 (Fri) @ 14:47

I am not really suggesting he alter his hitting approach.  Only that it might be easy to simply drop down bunts until they stop shifting, in which case, he goes back to his normal approach.  Surely that would be optimal, assuming that it is physically possible for him (and Delgado and Ortiz) to successfully bunt often enough into the shift.


#6          (see all posts) 2006/08/31 (Thu) @ 16:30

Bonds, I’d bet, is popping up considerably more than before.  Around the ASB, I checked his spray pattern.  He’s lost about 10 hits to the 2b/RF.  Not just a shift, for Bonds, it is even more exaggerated - the 2B plays much further on teh grass than other players’ shifts.

Nonetheless, I think Bonds is suffering from getting old, and hitting a bunch more pop-ups.

I wonder if McGwire saw the same efect when his BA plummeted his final season.


Page 1 of 1 pages


Name (required)
E-Mail (optional)
Website (optional)

<< Back to main


Latest...

COMMENTS

Nov 21 17:29
Sabermetric Moves of the 2009 Pre-Season

Nov 22 06:40
The New Triple Crown

Nov 22 06:24
Chance of Scoring by Base/Out, Retrosheet Years

Nov 22 02:48
How good are the Fans in evaluating fielding?

Nov 21 20:13
Runs Produced

Nov 21 19:27
Marcel 2009 is here

Nov 21 16:43
Nate Silver: hero to interviewers

Nov 21 10:57
New BBTN

Nov 20 20:34
ABSO-lutely… not!

Nov 20 19:23
R.I.P. Tom Boswell, sabermetrician; P.A.L.L.(*) Tom Boswell, human being