THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

<< Back to main

Monday, June 08, 2009

The 2-run sac fly

By Tangotiger, 11:25 AM

Pujols hit a 2-run sac fly in the first inning.  Gonzalez made a leaping catch in the alley, who then tossed it to the CF to relay it home, but not in time.  Fantastic fielding play.  For Pujols, this added +.035 wins or +0.27 runs, even though he “made” an out. 

It of course could have been alot worse.  The RE that Pujols found himself in was a 2.05 expected runs for the inning.  Had he hit a 2-run double, the Cards would have 2 runs in the bank, plus another 1.19 runs expected, for a gain of 1.14 runs.  Is there a way you could have done this in your head?

First off, realize that before Pujols, there was a runner on 2B.  After Pujols, had he hit a double, you would still have a runner on 2B.  So, that’s a 1-run gain right away.

As for the runner on 3B, he had around an 86% chance of scoring with 0 outs.  So, scoring him only adds .14 runs.  So, 1 plus .14 is 1.14.

Gonzalez’s diving play turned a 1.14 run play in to a .27 run play, meaning he saved .87 runs in the process.  That is, he knocked out Pujols from his 2B perch with 0 outs (worth 1.19 runs) to bases empty 1 out (almost like a CS), or worth .30 runs.  And 1.19 minus .30 is .89 runs.

(The .87 and .89 don’t match because I’m using two different RE matrix sources, this one, and the ones I gave Fangraphs.)


#1    puck      (see all posts) 2009/06/08 (Mon) @ 13:03

So, did the resulting WPA for the play on the fangraphs site end up being credited only to the pitcher (Jimenez) and the batter (Pujols)?


#2    Tangotiger      (see all posts) 2009/06/08 (Mon) @ 13:59

Yes, but that’s only because Fangraphs imposes it upon itself.

If David chooses to, he could have incorporated the chance that that ball would have been an out (say 1%) with a typical distribution of fielders, and then applied the win probability based on that expectation.

David chooses not to, for the simple reason that it’s an enormous pain in the b-tt to do something that complex for such a little gain (on a seasonal level).


#3          (see all posts) 2009/06/08 (Mon) @ 14:10

Two run sac fly?  How is that even possible!


#4    John Michaels      (see all posts) 2009/06/09 (Tue) @ 09:38

"How is that even possible!”

It’s a Cardinal thing (see the 1982 World Series).


Page 1 of 1 pages


Name (required)
E-Mail (optional; WILL be published)
Website (optional)

<< Back to main


Latest...

COMMENTS

Feb 11 20:29
Who is Jeremy Lin?

Feb 11 20:11
Clutch analogy

Feb 11 20:11
Fighting leads to goals?

Feb 11 19:55
Why do players get crappy caps?

Feb 11 19:12
Hero of the month: Brittney Baxter

Feb 11 17:59
MGL: Today on Clubhouse Confidential

Feb 11 16:48
Reader Mail of the Day: Why do we need X years of fielding data?  And what about outliers?

Feb 11 10:29
Dwight Evans

Feb 11 02:12
Performance through the ages

Feb 10 23:01
For Your Soul