THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews
If you are a media member and would like a review copy of The Book, please contact Kevin Cuddihy of Potomac Books.

Buy The Book from Amazon

MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

<< Back to main

Friday, February 01, 2008

Super Bowl Squares

By Tangotiger, 11:28 AM

Doug Drinen does what we’ve always wanted to do one second after the Squares sheet lands on our desk.


#1    JD      (see all posts) 2008/02/02 (Sat) @ 00:31

Great timing with this. Just the other day when I said “No” to another one of these pools I considered posting the question here on how likely one was to win, if buying more than one square was better, etc.

In terms of money value, I wonder what the number of purchased squares would give you the best chance of earning a profit. Is there a difference between 1 square or 10 squares? I wish I were better at math because it seems like the hard part has been done and what I’m wondering would be fairly easy.

And, for what it’s worth, all the pools I’ve seen were 25% for each quarter, not 10/10/10/70.


#2          (see all posts) 2008/02/03 (Sun) @ 09:55

Don’t forget that these numbers are probably dependent on the scoring environment and the difference between the two teams’ abilities. (in other words, the over/under and the spread) I’d love to see this same data but bucketed into games in which 20 or less pts were scored, 20-30, 30-40, etc. and likewise bucketed into games where the score difference was 0-3, 3-7, etc.

I don’t know where to get the data he used for quarter by quarter so I can’t do it myself at this point. It would also be neat to bucket based on historical spread and over/under, but historical gambling data I think is hard to obtain.


#3    Rally      (see all posts) 2008/02/04 (Mon) @ 01:02

We just did squares at a party I went to.  After picking our squares, we randomly assigned the numbers so nobody had an edge.  Prizes were awarded at the end of every quarter.

I won the 2nd and 3rd quarters, obviously since nobody scored in the 3rd.  If Maroney had scored his TD on the last play of Q1 instead of the 1st in Q@, I would have won 3.

Sometimes its better to be lucky than know the system.


Page 1 of 1 pages


Name (required)
E-Mail (optional)
Website (optional)

<< Back to main


Latest...

COMMENTS

Nov 21 17:29
Sabermetric Moves of the 2009 Pre-Season

Nov 22 06:40
The New Triple Crown

Nov 22 06:24
Chance of Scoring by Base/Out, Retrosheet Years

Nov 22 02:48
How good are the Fans in evaluating fielding?

Nov 21 20:13
Runs Produced

Nov 21 19:27
Marcel 2009 is here

Nov 21 16:43
Nate Silver: hero to interviewers

Nov 21 10:57
New BBTN

Nov 20 20:34
ABSO-lutely… not!

Nov 20 19:23
R.I.P. Tom Boswell, sabermetrician; P.A.L.L.(*) Tom Boswell, human being