THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

<< Back to main

Wednesday, September 01, 2010

Strasburg II

By Tangotiger, 11:41 AM

While it takes years to go from once-in-a-generation catcher Wieters I to go to Wieters II (Montero) to Wieters III (Bryce Harper), it took only two+ months to go from once-in-a-generation Strasburg I to Strasburg II (Aroldis Chapman).

The difference is that he walked ALOT of hitters in the minors, so he is unlike the polished Strasburg.  It’ll be interesting to see what the forecasters do with Chapman (who given his walk rate, might be more like the young Nolan Ryan and Randy Johnson, themselves also once-in-a-generation pitchers).

Place your bets, gentlemen, place your bets…


#1          (see all posts) 2010/09/01 (Wed) @ 12:07

Chapman throws really hard, but other than that, I don’t see much comparison to Strasburg.  Strasburg had four good pitches and good command/control.  Chapman has two good pitches but is wildly inconsistent with them.  If he can harness that over a longer period of time, maybe there’s something special there, but at the current time, no way is he near what Strasburg was when he was promoted to the majors. 

Fastball speed matters, but it’s not the be all, end all of pitching.


#2    Xeifrank      (see all posts) 2010/09/01 (Wed) @ 12:13

Should Chapman be projected as a starter or reliever for 2011?  Or some combo of both?
vr, Xei


#3    Rally      (see all posts) 2010/09/01 (Wed) @ 13:06

Compare him to Joel Zumaya for now, not Strasburg.


#4    Rally      (see all posts) 2010/09/01 (Wed) @ 13:09

"While it takes years to go from once-in-a-generation catcher Wieters I to go to Wieters II (Montero) to Wieters III (Bryce Harper),”

Why is “years” plural?  Seems like one year does the trick.  Wieters 2009 - Montero 2010 - Harper 2011.

Meanwhile, Buster Posey and Carlos Santana slipped in under the radar.


#5    Tangotiger      (see all posts) 2010/09/01 (Wed) @ 13:16

Mike, I didn’t mean that he was like Strasburg, just that the exuberance will reach those levels. 

In hockey, it was always “The Next One”, after “The Great One”.  Mario, Pierre Turgeon, Eric Lindros, Sidney Crosby, and a few more… just an endless list of players being crowned “The Next One”.


#6    David Gassko      (see all posts) 2010/09/01 (Wed) @ 13:46

Oliver projects a 5.20 ERA from Chapman this year. He’ll strike out a lot of hitters—Oliver projects 9.4 K/9, but his walks (6.1 BB/9) will be killer. So as far as Oliver is concerned, Chapman is nowhere near Strasburg.


#7          (see all posts) 2010/09/01 (Wed) @ 14:08

I do think it’s pretty cool that he may have the fastest fastball ever.  The initial look suggests he may be a little faster than Zumaya.  I was not expecting that despite the reports of radar gun readings over 100.

I’m dubious but somewhat hopeful about how that translates into baseball success.


#8    Rally      (see all posts) 2010/09/01 (Wed) @ 14:42

I have to be very skeptical on whether his arm can hold up.  And I have my doubts about whether he can be a starter - the lack of control means he’s going to be hurt by extra baserunners, and also by high pitch counts.  Randy Johnson survived those negatives to become a great pitcher, he pretty much had an indestructible arm - his injuries over the years were his back and knees.  There are thousands of hard throwers with poor control who couldn’t last long enough to fix their problems like Randy did.

As a relief pitcher I’m very optimistic about his success, especially short term.  He’s going to be a very impressive spectacle for the next month, and hopefully for Reds fans, into October.


#9    Rally      (see all posts) 2010/09/01 (Wed) @ 14:44

Fastest ever since they standardized velocity measurement, but we’ll never know exactly how hard Dalkowski threw.


#10          (see all posts) 2010/09/01 (Wed) @ 15:01

What about Strasburg III? Chris Sale, White Sox. Just got his first save. So far

IP 10
H 5
BB 7
HR 1
SO 16
ER 1


#11          (see all posts) 2010/09/01 (Wed) @ 15:06

I forgot.

Opp. Avg. .152


#12    Tangotiger      (see all posts) 2010/09/01 (Wed) @ 15:28

The [Wieters|Strasburg] [roman numeral] tag is reserved for players of whom prognosticators are aggressively exuberant.


#13          (see all posts) 2010/09/01 (Wed) @ 15:38

This just proves the White Sox get no respect


#14          (see all posts) 2010/09/01 (Wed) @ 15:53

Which projection system is high on Chapman?  Or are you expanding the definition to include human prognosticators shooting from the hip in the excitement of the moment?


#15    Tangotiger      (see all posts) 2010/09/01 (Wed) @ 15:57

Right, humans.

It’s going to be hard for a system to give him anything good if his walk rate is so high.

The question is should the walk rate count as lower because his fastball speed is so high?  Or does the fastball speed get used only to reinforce the estimates, so that a low ERA goes even lower after considering fastball speed, and a high ERA goes… lower?  higher? after considering the 103 mph?

If a forecasting system DOES NOT USE tools (like Oliver?, PECOTA?, Chone?, etc), then the 103 is irrelevant, like Strasburg’s 99 is irrelevant.  MGL for one said that he DOES use fastball speed.

How that gets applied to Chapman is unknown.


#16          (see all posts) 2010/09/01 (Wed) @ 16:00

Well, in my case, I just got excited because a White Sox closer did not blow a save. That makes him a big prospect for us. Maybe I’m just an amateur gnosticator.


#17    Sean      (see all posts) 2010/09/01 (Wed) @ 16:06

Rally, weren’t you thinking/talking about adding velocty (or something similar) to CHONE?


#18    Brian Cartwright      (see all posts) 2010/09/01 (Wed) @ 18:42

I have the Cuban league stats beginning in 2005, but so far there’s not enough comparables of other players who played in both Cuba and the US, and for which I have stats. After this season, there may be a bare minimum for batters (6-8 different players), but still less than a handful of pitchers.

That said, Chapman’s Triple-A stats have been very similar to what he posted his last three years in Cuba. In 2005, at age 17, he started 15 games, with 54 BB and 56 SO in 54 IP.

YEAR AGE Level G GS IP  PA  BC   H HR  BB  SO _BH   _HR   _BB   _SO
2005 17 Cuba 15 15  54 263 144  48  5  54  56 0.309 0.035 0.205 0.213
2006 18 Cuba 23 12  81 350 187  59  4  50 100 0.301 0.021 0.143 0.286
2007 19 Cuba 16 16  74 324 197  55  3  37  79 0.268 0.015 0.114 0.244
2008 20 Cuba 22 20 118 515 304 109  7  62 130 0.343 0.023 0.120 0.252
2010 22  AAA 39 13  96 412 229  77  7  52 125 0.315 0.031 0.126 0.303

2010     VsL           138  65  23  3  15  53 0.323 0.046 0.109 0.384
2010     VsR           274 164  54  4  37  72 0.313 0.024 0.135 0.263

Oliver’s MLE of 2010 is BB/9 6.5, SO/9 10.2, but after regression are 6.1, 9.4.

From what I’ve read, he had problems keeping the ball down, but has had better results since relieving. GO/AO as a starter was 0.83, as a reliever 1.46.

  
          IP   H  HR  BB  SO
Starter   66  60   6  40  76
Reliever  30  17   1  12  49

Considering Sale. Here’s Oliver’s MLEs

                       HR9 BB9  SO9
2008 Coll              1.3 3.7  7.2
2009 Coll              1.8 4.1  7.3
2010 Coll,A,AAA,MLB    1.4 2.6 10.0

ps I hope this doesn’t post twice, but the first time seemed to be lost so I am reposting


#19    J. Cross      (see all posts) 2010/09/01 (Wed) @ 19:11

I think high velocity makes the prior or peer mean strikeout rate that you regress to higher but it does really affect (or perhaps only makes slightly higher) the walk rate and flyball rates you regress to.  I don’t think it’s so much that high velocity causes high walk rates (probably the opposite) but rather that the control level needed to reach the majors is less if you throw super hard so Chapman’s hypothetical peer group includes pitchers who walk a fair number of batters.

Of course, lefties who throw as hard as Chapman more of less don’t exist.


#20    Rally      (see all posts) 2010/09/01 (Wed) @ 23:16

"Rally, weren’t you thinking/talking about adding velocty (or something similar) to CHONE?”

Yeah, but thinking/talking is a long way from doing.  Haven’t had the time to even start on that.

Did add him to my pitcher list, so he’s on the latest update.  As a Reliever I get a 3.93 ERA, 55 IP, 44 H, 30 BB, 6 HR, 70 K.  No Cuban stats, no knowledge of the radar gun, and data through Sunday so his MLB debut is an unknown, just his stats in the 40202.


#21    Nathaniel Dawson      (see all posts) 2010/09/03 (Fri) @ 20:51

"we’ll never know exactly how hard Dalkowski threw.”

Or Ryne Duren or Sidd Finch, either.


Page 1 of 1 pages


Name (required)
E-Mail (optional; WILL be published)
Website (optional)

<< Back to main


Latest...

COMMENTS

Feb 11 16:48
Reader Mail of the Day: Why do we need X years of fielding data?  And what about outliers?

Feb 11 16:10
Clutch analogy

Feb 11 15:58
MGL: Today on Clubhouse Confidential

Feb 11 11:54
Who is Jeremy Lin?

Feb 11 10:29
Dwight Evans

Feb 11 02:12
Performance through the ages

Feb 10 23:01
For Your Soul

Feb 10 21:07
Hero of the month: Brittney Baxter

Feb 10 18:32
Moneyball at Villanova

Feb 10 17:00
Psst… wanna intern in Canada?