THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews
If you are a media member and would like a review copy of The Book, please contact Kevin Cuddihy of Potomac Books.

Buy The Book from Amazon

MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

<< Back to main

Sunday, April 06, 2008

Sort of a Review of Canseco’s book, Vindicated

By , 08:52 PM

I ordered, received and read most of it.  It is the kind of book that you probably do not want to read cover to cover unless you have absolutely nothing better to do with your life. 


First of all, like his first book, it is not written well at all.  Which is kind of ironic I should say that, given the long BTF thread about, among other things, the quality of my writing.

Also, it does NOT have a lot of new material.  Much of the book is a rehash of stuff in the first book, almost word for word, boring transcripts of Canseco’s polygraph exams, the Mitchel Report, and the speech that he gave at the first Congressional hearing (the one with Sosa, Palmeiro, et al.), and some not-so-interesting stories of Jose’s personal life.

As far as “blockbuster” disclosures of players who were not mentioned in the first book (or the Mitchell Report, I guess), well, what the original publisher or ghost author (the guy who turned down Canseco’s proposal to do the book) said about there not being enough material on these “other players” is right on the money.  There is virtually nothing that can’t be said in 1 or 2 pages and it is not particularly earth-shattering.

Warning: The following may be a spoiler.

1) He talks about Clemens material getting redacted from his first book and some interviews.  The ONLY thing he says about Clemens and PED’s in this book, and which he apparently wanted in the first book, was that he suspected that Clemens was a juicer only because of his performance and size and a few comments he made to Jose about PED’s.  He admits that he has no knowledge whatsoever that Clemens used PED’s, and in fact, he says that when he met Clemens and his lawyers in Texas, he though that perhaps he made a mistake about his suspicions.

2) He talks about how he personally introduced Magglio Ordonez to PED’s, and shot him up himself.  I don’t know if that has ever been said publicly before or even if Ordonez is in the Mitchell Report.

3) He says that A-Rod, when he was much younger, and before he got married, was hitting on his wife and calling her on her cell phone.  And he said that A-Rod was asking him about PED’s and that he (Canseco) hooked him up with a personal trainer who was also a supplier of PED’s.  Canseco says that he has no idea what happened eventually between A-Rod and the trainer.  He says or implies that A-Rod ended up taking PED’s but that he has no firsthand knowledge of such.  He also says that he hates A-Rod’s guts.

End of spoiler.

That is it, completely, with the new revelations.

Now, Canseco seems to have a large ego, seems to be insecure, and seems to be obsessed with telling people how great a ballplayer he was, and how big and strong he is, almost to the point of it being ridiculous.

His claim that he wrote the book and outed all of the players for “the good of baseball” is dubious, but I don’t completely dismiss it.  He thinks and says that history will remember him as “the one who saved baseball,” which is a little preposterous and egotistical as well.

All that being said, I think that Canseco got screwed by baseball, by many of his friends, by the media, and who knows who else.  I also think that he basically has told the truth about virtually everything despite a lot of people’s effort to discredit him and call him a liar.

I actually have a lot of sympathy and respect for him and think that he got an undeserved, bad shake in a lot of areas.  Obviously, I don’t know him, and although he seems a bit quirky, he may actually be a pretty good and honest guy, with admirable intentions.  I don’t think that all the bad press he gets from the MSM and on sites like BTF, is fair.

As far as the book is concerned, it really is not worth purchasing.  If you do nothing but read the above “spoiler,” you literally get the essence of the entire book, unless you really want to read about Canseco playing in a Sunday amateur baseball league or in the Golden Baseball League for the San Diego Surf Dogs.

#1    Eric J. Seidman      (see all posts) 2008/04/06 (Sun) @ 23:56

Yeah, I felt pretty much the same way.  And I’ve actually defended Canseco in certain areas online.  Just because he may be doing this for money doesn’t mean he is necessarily lying.  The one thing he said in that Nightline/Dateline/Whateverline interview that stood out to me was something to the effect of - “Let’s see how many people call me a liar.”

Appearing on The Surreal Life won’t help his cause and when members of the media point out that he does this for money and his intentions are off-base then most of America is going to combine the two and determine he is full of fecal matter.

Personally, I wanted some mad dirt on Alex Sanchez in this book.


#2          (see all posts) 2008/04/07 (Mon) @ 00:53

The world is full of “opinions”, sometimes from smart people and people who fancy themselves experts, based only on what they have heard from some other source (if you say something loud or often enough, people will eventually think it is true), regardless of how credible that source is, AND based on whatever serves them the best.

I am quite confident that almost every accusation, other than the more vague ones (like Kenny Williams MUST have known that his players were using steroids), made by Canseco, are accurate.  I am also quite confident that virtually anytime a player fingered by Canseco says that he is a liar, they are the ones lying. ALL of the accusations made in the first book that were denied by the players, turned out to be true, as far as I can recall.

That doesn’t mean that everything he says is true, but it has got to tell you something.

When people speak the truth, but for whatever reasons, other people don’t like them, or what they have to say, they go out of their way to discredit that person and what he says.  Just read the BTF thread I keep referring to.  It is sad, but true.  Most people are petty, selfish, and jealous.  That is just human nature.  I am pretty sure I am in the same boat.


#3    Eric J. Seidman      (see all posts) 2008/04/07 (Mon) @ 01:06

Everyone is in the same boat; you are, I am, everyone.  No matter how different everyone may think they are, we really are not.  I know what you mean with the BTF thread.  If you read the comments on any given BTF thread you are likely to find a ton of negatives and not in the form of constructive criticism.  Our world is a cynical one and we would rather paint someone in a negative light than shed the same light on the positives.

As childish as it seems to write that he hates A-Rod’s guts, like you said, most of the accusations are true.  What gets publicized is hating A-Rod’s guts not that he had a 100% accusory rate.

When Canseco and Schilling had that fued over naming names--that lasted twelve minutes--Canseco was very honest in saying he knew nothing about Schilling with drugs and did not want to talk about what he did not know.  The way he is painted in the media we would expect him to accuse someone out of spite - but that just does not seem to be the case.  Clearly the A-Rod accusation does not really hold water but if I am a former teammate of his that used I would be very afraid right now.

But then again, said teammates could just confess and then we’ll not only forget they took steroids but we will applaud them for coming forward.

Anyone remember that scene at the end of “Quiz Show” when everyone cheers Ralph Fiennes for admitting he cheated and then cliche New York character basically said it was stupid to applaud this honesty because Ralph should have known better?


#4    dave smyth      (see all posts) 2008/04/07 (Mon) @ 07:35

Even if Canseco is telling is telling the truth, he is still a dirty snitch. There was (must have been) at least an implied, commonly understood agreement among players, that this stuff was very confidential. That’s why every other player, even those that didn’t use, won’t say anything.

It’s not like he is ratting out a child rapist, as he of course should. Steroid use is sort of a victimless crime, like pot smoking. Canseco is ratting out former friends and acquantances--former TEAMMATES--just to make money.

There’s nothing to admire about Canseco, mgl.


#5    MGL      (see all posts) 2008/04/07 (Mon) @ 16:54

That is your opinion, and we don’t know if he is doing it just to make money.  I do agree that it is a little distasteful ratting out players though.  Your point is well-taken.


#6          (see all posts) 2008/04/07 (Mon) @ 17:30

Distasteful?  Rat?  Snitch?  If you’re him, you’re kind of stuck between a rock and a hard place, right?  What’s worse - keeping the truth a secret, or being a snitch?  There’s something to be said for offering truthful information that a couple thousand guys are conspiring to keep secret.  The truth is the truth, and while I firmly believe Canseco is sharing the truth to make money, I also believe that he’s doing a good thing.  There are very, very few situations in life where I feel it’s better to hide the truth, and this certainly isn’t one of them.


#7    jlc      (see all posts) 2008/04/07 (Mon) @ 20:22

I don’t think steroid use is a victimless crime. Everyone who used made the decision that their criminal self-interest was more important than that of other kids who played by the rules. Who knows how many guys didn’t get a chance because of the edge steroids gave to some players. Beyond that, it made every player have to decide whether or not to use, and I’m betting there are a lot who succumbed to the pressure who hated doing so.

That’s why to me, the blame and the repercussions have to be focused on management. If it was a few rogues doing it, I’d say off with their heads. But people making a lot of money by setting up a dirty system stink.


#8    MGL      (see all posts) 2008/04/07 (Mon) @ 20:31

6 and 7 are good points too.  I think that both points of view are reasonable.  Depends on how “bad” you think taking steroids was and whether ratting your ex-friends out is worth it for the good of the game or of the children.

#6, almost everyone I know cheats a little on their taxes in various ways.  Several of them cheat on their spouses.  I even know someone who exceeded the speed limit the other day.  Oh, and another friend smokes pot on a regular basis. Another one actually sells pot. It has not once, ever crossed my mind to rat any of them out, and I think I am on firm moral ground.

It is probably clear-cut when to rat out your friends, co-workers, or acquaintances (or strangers) at either end of the spectrum.  There is a gigantic section of the spectrum in between, however, where it is not even close to being clear what is the “correct” thing to do.  When I say, “it is not clear,” it could be that it is clear to 54% of a group of people that ratting is correct, and the other 46% think that not ratting is correct.  That qualifies to me as being “not clear,” if you know what I mean.


#9    tangotiger      (see all posts) 2008/04/07 (Mon) @ 21:06

jlc/7: the blame is not to management, but to the players themselves.  I know if I were a player, I would not want drugs in my sport.  I’d make sure of that.  The players however have no spine on this issue.  You need a Curt Flood.  As it is, they accept the uneven playing ground here, and do nothing about it.  How pathetic.  The players deserve whatever ill-will is generated against them.  And, I’m as pro-player, pro-union as there is.

Management doesn’t care.  Why should they?  Their priority is the bottom line.

Fans don’t care.  What they want is high-level competition, and prefer not knowing anything bad.  They’d prefer the media gets their nose out of this, and for that reason alone, they’d like to rid the sport of drugs.  Take out the media, and the fans don’t care.

And I don’t buy the “kids” argument.  When I was growing up, rock stars were the far stronger influence on youth.  I don’t see anyone up in arms with the drugs that permeates the music scene, drugs that have far deadlier effects than whatever ballplayers use.

Baseball is held to the “virgin” standard, of the old man (like senators) protecting his daughter from all comers, making sure to keep her pure, and aghast at finding out that she’s really banging every guy in town.

Baseball is a pure and beautiful game.  And that has nothing at all to do with what MLB is.  The NFL gets off scot-free here, because football is not a beautiful game.

***

As for ratting out, etc: his teammates are nothing more than acquaintances, just as my former collegues at work are almost strangers at this point.  People owe themselves to people they care about, not to people who they happen to at one time share common interests.

Family, a few really close friends, are off-limits.  Ratting our McGwire, Palmeiro, et al?  Who cares?  Why does Canseco owe them?  I’d have a problem if Canseco was placed in a position of trust, and if he were a third party to all this.  Otherwise, the truth takes precedence.


Page 1 of 1 pages


Name (required)
E-Mail (optional)
Website (optional)

<< Back to main


Latest...

COMMENTS

Nov 21 17:29
Sabermetric Moves of the 2009 Pre-Season

Nov 22 06:40
The New Triple Crown

Nov 22 06:24
Chance of Scoring by Base/Out, Retrosheet Years

Nov 22 02:48
How good are the Fans in evaluating fielding?

Nov 21 20:13
Runs Produced

Nov 21 19:27
Marcel 2009 is here

Nov 21 16:43
Nate Silver: hero to interviewers

Nov 21 10:57
New BBTN

Nov 20 20:34
ABSO-lutely… not!

Nov 20 19:23
R.I.P. Tom Boswell, sabermetrician; P.A.L.L.(*) Tom Boswell, human being