THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews
If you are a media member and would like a review copy of The Book, please contact Kevin Cuddihy of Potomac Books.

Buy The Book from Amazon

MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

<< Back to main

Friday, July 18, 2008

Selling beer to someone who looks under 30, is 22, and the legal age is 18

By Tangotiger, 02:44 PM

Skydome.  Requiring someone to ask for ID of someone who “looks” under 30 seems to me like a pornography law: you know it when you see it.  Aramark insists that their mystery shoppers “definitely” look under 30.  But, this is an art, not a science.  To that end, does it make sense to fire someone over art?  I’d also like to know what would have happened had a policeman seen this transaction take place?

Great comments in the link.  These are my two favorites:


The people protesting should be taking it up with the provincial government and the fines in place because a $200,000 fine for selling alcohol to a minor when an actual stock trader only gets fined $50,000 for intentional fraud that cause millions in damages makes little sense to me.

...

I am 22 years old btw. When I go to sporting events billboards and vendors scream at me to buy beer. When I go to purchase one sometimes I feel like I’m about to be cavity searched. The irony!

#1    Andy      (see all posts) 2008/07/18 (Fri) @ 20:59

Indeed, how can anyone “definitely” look under 30? I look pretty young for my age, and I’ll be 30 in a couple years. When I am, I will attempt to find a store with a similar sign, and when they ask me for ID, I will say, I am 30, I look 30, I won’t show you my ID, now please serve me.


#2    MGL      (see all posts) 2008/07/18 (Fri) @ 22:03

There HAS to be a grey area if you are required to ID someone who looks under 30 but not under 30.0000001.

However, if these mystery shoppers definitely look young, then he probably made a mistake in not ID’ing this one.  However, of course he should not be fired on the spot.  Then again, it is their company and they can do whatever they want. Maybe they have a no tolerance policy toward ID’ing someone who obviously looks young.  That does not strike me as being outrageous (having a no-tolerance policy).

On the other hand, one person’s “obviously very young” can be another person’s “obviously over- 30.” So who knows.

As is usually the case, we might not know the whole story and there might be other reasons he got fired.

If we are outraged every time someone gets fired that maybe does not deserve to be fired, we would be outraged every second of every day.


#3          (see all posts) 2008/07/19 (Sat) @ 00:33

Why don’t they just raise it to 40? The drinking age in the US is only 3 years higher, and at Yankee Stadium they ID under 40 (at least according to their little pins).


#4    simon      (see all posts) 2008/07/19 (Sat) @ 04:27

Drinking age in Ontario is 19, in Quebec it’s 18. But yeah, that immediate firing is ridiculous.


Page 1 of 1 pages


Name (required)
E-Mail (optional)
Website (optional)

<< Back to main


Latest...

COMMENTS

Nov 19 15:14
Sabermetric Moves of the 2009 Pre-Season

Nov 19 19:13
Offense by position groups by decade

Nov 19 18:30
My 1B is better than your 1B

Nov 19 18:04
Nate Silver: hero to interviewers

Nov 19 17:32
Changes in home run rates during the Retrosheet years

Nov 19 16:40
One Year and One Million Hits Later

Nov 19 16:22
Soria as a starter?

Nov 19 13:50
Response of a fired head coach

Nov 19 11:26
MLB logo

Nov 19 10:53
BDB Database (MS Access)