Monday, September 20, 2010
Roger Ebert v Phoenix+Affleck
Ebert does what I always hope forecasters do: test themselves. And, that he does. Ebert in his review of the movie pretty much presume the movie was not a hoax. Now that it’s been revealed it is a hoax, Ebert not only does an analysis of the movie based on how you went into the movie, but he also looks at the other “forecasters” to see what they thought of the movie before the beans were spilled. It makes for a great read.
By the way, Roger Ebert = Joe Posnanski. It’s pretty hard for either of them to write something bad. I mean, I am NEVER going to see that movie, but Ebert makes me want to see that movie. I just love the way these guys think and write.


You like reading what a guy writes about watching a movie?
Is it just me or I am the only one that finds that to be a combination of amusing and peculiar?
I like paintings of classic novels. *wink*