THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

<< Back to main

Monday, September 20, 2010

Roger Ebert v Phoenix+Affleck

By Tangotiger, 11:34 AM

Ebert does what I always hope forecasters do: test themselves.  And, that he does.  Ebert in his review of the movie pretty much presume the movie was not a hoax.  Now that it’s been revealed it is a hoax, Ebert not only does an analysis of the movie based on how you went into the movie, but he also looks at the other “forecasters” to see what they thought of the movie before the beans were spilled.  It makes for a great read.

By the way, Roger Ebert = Joe Posnanski.  It’s pretty hard for either of them to write something bad.  I mean, I am NEVER going to see that movie, but Ebert makes me want to see that movie.  I just love the way these guys think and write.


Blogging
#1          (see all posts) 2010/09/20 (Mon) @ 13:23

You like reading what a guy writes about watching a movie?

Is it just me or I am the only one that finds that to be a combination of amusing and peculiar?

I like paintings of classic novels. *wink*


#2    Tangotiger      (see all posts) 2010/09/20 (Mon) @ 13:29

As much as I like reading a guy that writes about watching a baseball game.  Check out the classic Bill James, Royals 1985 World Series essay.


#3          (see all posts) 2010/09/20 (Mon) @ 14:06

Check out the classic Bill James, Royals 1985 World Series essay.

Or the 1960 John Updike essay, “Hub Fans Bid Kid Adieu”.  That’s good writing no matter what the subject.

I have a special fondness for Roger Ebert, since he is an Urbana IL native and still comes back every April for his Roger Ebert Film Festival, despite the fact he can no longer speak.


#4    Tangotiger      (see all posts) 2010/09/23 (Thu) @ 09:11

But the put-on of the night came from Letterman. He said that when he and his company asked to be paid a license fee by Affleck for using five minutes of “Late Show with David Letterman” in “I’m Still Here,” they were told that the excerpt was considered “fair use” for a documentary. In a comic gotcha moment, Letterman said that now they know it’s not a documentary—it’s “a theatrical ruse”—and “now you owe me a million bucks.” ("Can we talk about this in private?” Phoenix asked. “Yeah, we’ll go to one of your screenings,” Letterman suggested.)

http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/entertainment/movies/blog/2010/09/david_letterman_bests_joaquin.html


Page 1 of 1 pages


Name (required)
E-Mail (optional; WILL be published)
Website (optional)

<< Back to main


Latest...

COMMENTS

May 25 11:31
Do pitcher’s reach back for velocity when needed?

May 25 11:26
Lack of hustle during a game

May 25 11:22
What sabermetrics is NOT

May 25 10:58
Rooting for laundry

May 25 10:14
Largest demonstration in Canadian history?

May 25 02:38
NFLPA lawsuit against collusion

May 25 01:43
Neal Huntington’s best moves

May 24 17:04
Firefox, IE, or Chrome?

May 24 12:07
How to beat the shift

May 24 11:11
Incredible story