Wednesday, May 19, 2010
Reader mail of the day: FIP v ERA
Hi,
I’m not exactly a stat-savvy baseball fan, but I enjoy reading your blog. I have a probably simple question to ask but I didn’t know of anyone else I could ask who would answer me.
Basically: If you figured out the total xFIP of a team and subtracted it from the team’s actual RA/9, would that give you a good sense of how a team’s defense is doing? It seems quick and dirty but I don’t see why it wouldn’t give a good overall picture of team defenses.
Thanks for your time,
The difference between FIP and RA/9 is that RA/9 includes these four things:
1. Team fielding
2. Pitching talent on balls in play
3. Sequencing of events (i.e., performance with men on base)
4. Park factors (different park factors also applies to FIP)
So, it would be inappropriate to think #1 alone is the cause.


I realize that you (Tango) were purposely not including “luck” in your list, but it is certainly a big part of RA/9 that is not included in xFIP.
Why choose such a circuitous route (RA/9-FIP) anyway? Team BABIP, otherwise known as DER, gives you a decent idea as to team defense, although it obviously does not account for the type, locations, and speed (and other things) of batted balls or park effects. If you want to do a little better, DER adjusted for the GB/BIP of the pitching staff is pretty good. Or just go to FG and check out team UZR!