THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

<< Back to main

Friday, August 14, 2009

Poz is right

By Tangotiger, 09:53 AM

Poz reads my mind and makes it all make sense. Yup.

Truth is, I have a hard time summoning moral outrage in today’s day and age. It’s probably because I have a hard time keeping up with what’s morally outrageous. Congress investigates steroids but Bob Dole advertises Viagra. Rick Pitino cheats on his wife and bizarrely invokes 9/11 in his apology, and if I click on this pop-up ad I can “meet married women eager for a change in their lives right now!” I don’t know. I really don’t. The only thing I do know, and know for sure, is that if you have an erection lasting more than four hours, seek immediate medical help.


#1    LVHCM1      (see all posts) 2009/08/14 (Fri) @ 14:36

Legal: Is it that big a leap to think that doctors could prescribe steroids to players to allow them to play the game better and longer? After all, using steroids with a prescription (like using Viagra with a prescription) is perfectly “legal.” Is it that big a leap? In a world where doctors will prescribe potentially harmful drugs to allow people to have sex, is it crazy to think that doctors (in only a slightly different environment) might prescribe steroids to help an athlete overcome an injury or play the game at a high level longer or give an athlete a chance to fulfill dreams? After all, we all know doctors will perform surgeries on athletes to accomplish those same goals.

Actually, it was pretty easy to find a doctor that would do this before AAS became schedule III in the early ‘90’s. And it became schedule III against the recommendation of the AMA, DEA, and FDA.

I was just giving thought to this issue the other day. Watching any sporting event, we are told:

Can’t get it up?  Take this pill!

Can’t urinate like you did when you were a teenager? Take this pill!

Depressed? Take this pill!

LOOK HOW COOL DRINKING IS!

The hypocrisy is mind blowing.


#2    Tangotiger      (see all posts) 2009/08/14 (Fri) @ 14:50

If you could take a pill that would regulate your body at all times (meaning that you would never have to exercise right or eat healthy) it would become a daily pill for all human beings.

And if this meant that it would shave 10 years off your life, a large percentage of people would insist on the right to take it.

There is no question at all that every person here would prostitute his body, and it’s just a matter of finding the price.  For example, taking the wonder pill would mean dying one day early.  Would you do it?  G-dd-mn right you would, since you would save yourself 2 hours of exercise a week for the rest of your life.

Ballplayers have made the choice by balancing the pros/cons.  The only reason we don’t make those choices is because we haven’t been put in those places, or that the pros/cons are decidely to one side.

Give everyone the tough choice, and you are not so high-and-mighty any more.


Page 1 of 1 pages


Name (required)
E-Mail (optional)
Website (optional)

<< Back to main


Latest...

COMMENTS

Aug 31 15:28
Fans Scouting Report: Update

Sep 02 15:02
Mail: rWAR v fWAR

Sep 02 14:59
Roger Federer

Sep 02 14:59
It’s hard to beat the crowd (Vegas in this case) no matter how smart you think you are

Sep 02 14:57
Could Rob Dibble have been a comp for Strasburg?

Sep 02 14:15
WOWY Teachers

Sep 02 13:37
Who’s Waldo?

Sep 02 08:36
Team Elin

Sep 02 01:19
Can someone tell me why Trevor Hoffman is still allowed to pitch?

Sep 01 23:16
Strasburg II