THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

<< Back to main

Saturday, October 08, 2011

Poll: I saw the ENTIRE Halladay/Carpenter duel and I thought:

By Tangotiger, 08:48 AM


SabermetricsPoll
#1    dave smyth      (see all posts) 2011/10/08 (Sat) @ 09:28

I voted for ‘even’ . ERA says Carpenter was better, and I presume DIPS says Halladay was better.

But the 1st inning triple and double that allowed the game’s only run were clean shots off Halladay; the fielding had nothing to do with it.

OTOH, I recall a great play by Furcal which saved a hit off Carpenter. With a man already on base, who knows what would have happened had that gone thru for a hit.


#2    Tangotiger      (see all posts) 2011/10/08 (Sat) @ 10:29

Right, there were alot of fielding plays in this game.  The catchers were involved as well (bunts, hits off pitcher, etc).  Halladay had the bases loaded and worked himself out of it.

If you were to go through it play by play (which I hope someone does do, because this would be very instructive), I’m not sure who would end up on top here.


#3    Matthew Cornwell      (see all posts) 2011/10/08 (Sat) @ 11:27

xFIP aside, both had some shots caught at the track too.  Holliday hit that one ball about 405 to dead center, for example.  Utley and Ibanez had some near misses too.


#4    James K.      (see all posts) 2011/10/08 (Sat) @ 12:53

Any of the middle 3 options seems reasonable (I chose evenly matched) but to say either one pitched significantly better is a hard sell.


#5    Tangotiger      (see all posts) 2011/10/08 (Sat) @ 17:05

I asked the various luminaries to give me their “component” ERAs.

Matt Swartz was the first to reply.  SIRA (the RA9 version of SIERA) came back with:
3.24 Doc
3.31 Carp

I must say, that’s impressive!

***

FIP:
1.83 Doc
2.53 Carp

***

The 4 versions of Game Score:
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/game-score-and-crowd-sourcing/

Game Score 1: Runs Allowed
40 + (6.4 * IP) – (10 * R)

81 Doc
98 Carp

Game Score 2: K/BB
40 + (0.4 * IP) + 3 * (SO – BB)

61 Doc
53 Carp

Game Score 3: FIP
40 + (2.5 * IP) + FIPcore

71 Doc
69 Carp

Game Score 4: Linear Weights
40 + (8.4 * IP) + LWTScore

74 Doc
101 Carp

So, depending where you fall in the Doc v Carp matchup will tell you which of the 4 metrics you prefer.

A pure simple average of the 4:
72 Doc
80 Carp

Since there seems to be a slight bias toward thinking that Doc pitched better, that means those people prefer the K/BB numbers more.

I should note that Carp pitched 9 innings to Doc’s 8.  I think that might make a big deal.

Then again, Doc faced one more batter than Carp did.


#6    mscaa      (see all posts) 2011/10/08 (Sat) @ 18:45

That slight bias toward Halladay might also be people taking into account the quality of the opposing hitters. I don’t know how much it matters, but Doc likely did have a tougher task facing the Cardinals line up.


Page 1 of 1 pages


Name (required)
E-Mail (optional; WILL be published)
Website (optional)

<< Back to main


Latest...

COMMENTS

May 25 10:14
Largest demonstration in Canadian history?

May 25 09:39
What sabermetrics is NOT

May 25 09:31
Do pitcher’s reach back for velocity when needed?

May 25 06:39
Lack of hustle during a game

May 25 02:38
NFLPA lawsuit against collusion

May 25 01:43
Neal Huntington’s best moves

May 24 23:50
Rooting for laundry

May 24 17:04
Firefox, IE, or Chrome?

May 24 12:07
How to beat the shift

May 24 11:11
Incredible story