Monday, September 21, 2009
PITCHf/x (nee: FoxTrax Puck)
Very cool finding by Mike Fast.
Buy The Book from Amazon
For some reason, it’s not a problem when a baseball is hit to the OF, and all you see is the outfielder.
You don’t follow the puck all-the-way (just as needed), but you follow the players all-the-way.
I was just thinking on sunday when in the Metrodome how fans think routine flyouts are homeruns off the bat. The problem is that they are watching the ball instead of the player. If they watched the outfielder (and in some cases, the batter) they’d know right away if the ball had potential to be an XBH. I wonder if they did have an angle on tv that showed the flight of the ball all the time if fans would get similarly fooled, or if they’d start to be able to tell off the bat.
Feb 11 23:23
Reader Mail of the Day: Why do we need X years of fielding data? And what about outliers?
Feb 11 22:49
Clutch analogy
Feb 11 22:08
Who is Jeremy Lin?
Feb 11 20:11
Fighting leads to goals?
Feb 11 19:55
Why do players get crappy caps?
Feb 11 19:12
Hero of the month: Brittney Baxter
Feb 11 17:59
MGL: Today on Clubhouse Confidential
Feb 11 10:29
Dwight Evans
Feb 11 02:12
Performance through the ages
Feb 10 23:01
For Your Soul
Great read there.
The worst thing about FoxTrax was that it didn’t let you see the actual puck. I don’t have any problem following the puck on TV, unless it is obscured by a giant blue/red fuzz ball. I don’t want to follow an approximation of the puck, I want to follow the puck. If they would have avoided overwhelming the puck with their graphics, I would have been ok with it.