THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews
If you are a media member and would like a review copy of The Book, please contact Kevin Cuddihy of Potomac Books.

Buy The Book from Amazon

MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

<< Back to main

Tuesday, August 14, 2007

Pitch Count Distribution

By Tangotiger, 03:52 PM

http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/strikethrowers-and-control-freaks/

Note to Sal:
1. If you include IBB, I think you will find number of pitches per walk to be 5.5
2. If you focus on BIP per PA, to get your groups of pitchers, I think you might get results that match our expectations, as noted here:
http://www.tangotiger.net/pitchCountEstimator.html


#1          (see all posts) 2007/08/14 (Tue) @ 16:41

Thanks, Tango.  I’ll put that on the laundry list of ways to chop of the data!  Another suggestion was to group pitchers by strike percentage, which I also plan to do.  (Other ways to group might include swing percentage induced, called strike rate, etc.)


#2    Tangotiger      (see all posts) 2007/08/14 (Tue) @ 17:38

Yes, those are all good too.

Think of the way baseball works.  You start at a 0-0 count, and you have 12 possible counts, at which you can end at any one of them.  The less percentage of contacted pitches, the deeper you go in the count.  If the rate of called balls to non-contacted pitches is high, you’ll end up with more balls per PA across the board.  So, a guy like RJ, who has a low contact rate and a low called balls rate means that he goes deeper in the count, and he goes deeper into the 2-strike counts than the 3-ball counts.  And the other thing is the number of foul strikes.

What I did was create a basic Markov to model this.  It’s rather fascinating, and I should write it up at some point now that I have far more data to test it against.  (I did not do sequencing, which may be an issue.)

In any case, except for guys who are incredibly smart and break the Markov (Greg Maddux notably), it’s a pretty straightforward process to determine the number of pitches for each event for most pitchers.  For a guy like Maddux, he’d have a very specific Markov chain that you’d have to model.  (Obviously, each pitcher would have his own Markov chain, but, most pitchers can be handled with the same transition chain, with just the inputs changed.  Maddux has different frequency/inputs and different transition rates, which makes him unique.)


#3    Guy      (see all posts) 2007/08/15 (Wed) @ 12:39

I’ll be interested to see the results for strike%.  More generally, strike% may prove to be a useful stat for understanding pitchers’ effectiveness.  It’s certainly not as simple as high strike% = good pitcher: Roger Clemens, for example, is just average (63%), and some below-average pitchers have been successful (notably Zito, Zambrano, and Glavine).  However, if you rank pitchers by strike% at Bball-Ref (I looked at starters with 500+ IP), it’s clear that a high strike% is generally associated with success:  the top 20 pitchers have ERA+ of 117, vs. 94 for bottom 20 (unweighted averages).  The top 15 include Schilling, Oswalt, Halladay, Pedro, RJ, Maddux, Mussina and Santana.  And eyeballing the list, it also looks like a high strike% is associated with being able to go deeper into games, and perhaps longer careers.


#4          (see all posts) 2007/08/28 (Tue) @ 17:02

As a coda:

http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/in-search-of-efficient-pitchers/

It’s a small effect and it doesn’t look like it’s controlled by the pitcher anyhow.


Page 1 of 1 pages


Name (required)
E-Mail (optional)
Website (optional)

<< Back to main


Latest...

COMMENTS

Jan 08 04:25
Sabermetric Moves of the 2009 Pre-Season

Jan 09 02:33
Cheers

Jan 08 23:45
The first Hardball Times Annual available for download!

Jan 08 21:16
Line Drives

Jan 08 20:23
(recent) Historical WAR on Fangraphs

Jan 08 16:07
Clint Eastwood is Archie Bunker

Jan 08 16:06
Hardball Times Annual 2008, starring…

Jan 08 15:58
Madoff’s Ponzi

Jan 08 03:41
Valuing relievers

Jan 07 17:41
The latest in park factors