THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

<< Back to main

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Physics of tennis courts

By Tangotiger, 02:47 PM

I didn’t know that the surface of tennis matches is not covered by its rule book.  Fascinating.

But the physics of tennis — those impersonal forces shaping every shot — are not constant. Instead, they largely depend on three separate factors determined by the court surface.

The most important factor is the “coefficient of friction,” a measurement of the abrasive force between the ground and the tennis ball. Courts with high frictional coefficients interfere with the movement of the ball, disrupting its forward momentum. Think of a sluggish clay court. According to experiments performed by the ITF, a shot hit without spin and traveling at 67 mph will lose about 43 percent of its ground speed after contact with the clay surface, slowing down to a leisurely 38 mph. (The reason clay steals momentum is rooted in the friction of all that loose brick, which clumps around the ball. Each clump is like a little speed bump.) As a result, players have a few extra milliseconds to hit a return....


#1          (see all posts) 2011/08/30 (Tue) @ 19:32

I remember reading a SI article 25(?) years ago in which a tennis court designer said that he could come up with 5 different surfaces such that each of the top 5 players would be a favorite to win a tournament on one of the surfaces.  Probably exaggerated, but of course the winner of the French Open often does poorly at Wimbildon.


#2          (see all posts) 2011/08/30 (Tue) @ 21:32

Howard Brody, who is mentioned in the article, used to be the world expert on the physics of tennis.  Nowadays, he is inactive and probably has been surpassed by Rod Cross.  In particular, I doubt there is anyone who knows more about how to characterize and measure the properties of court surfaces than Rod.  An Aussi, he frequently does these measurements on the courts used for the Australian Open.  Rod has also done lots of work on the physics of baseball and he and I have worked on a number of projects together.  See his web site at http://www.physics.usyd.edu.au/~cross/.


#3    JD      (see all posts) 2011/08/31 (Wed) @ 23:30

David Foster Wallace has a fantastic essay on how he was an almost-great tennis player as a kid even though he wasn’t particularly skilled or athletic because he learned how to play the courses. It’s only somewhat related to this, but it’s definitely worth a read.


Page 1 of 1 pages


Name (required)
E-Mail (optional; WILL be published)
Website (optional)

<< Back to main


Latest...

COMMENTS

May 25 09:39
What sabermetrics is NOT

May 25 09:31
Do pitcher’s reach back for velocity when needed?

May 25 06:43
Largest demonstration in Canadian history?

May 25 06:39
Lack of hustle during a game

May 25 02:38
NFLPA lawsuit against collusion

May 25 01:43
Neal Huntington’s best moves

May 24 23:50
Rooting for laundry

May 24 17:04
Firefox, IE, or Chrome?

May 24 12:07
How to beat the shift

May 24 11:11
Incredible story