THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews
If you are a media member and would like a review copy of The Book, please contact Kevin Cuddihy of Potomac Books.

Buy The Book from Amazon

MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

<< Back to main

Sunday, September 03, 2006

Most Valuable Hitters, 2006

By Tangotiger, 08:28 PM

Based on the quality and timing of their performance, Fangraphs is showing the following hitters as leaders in WPA:
Pujols +7.1 wins
Howard +6.1 wins

Ortiz +6.3 wins
Jeter +5.5 wins
Dye +5.4 wins

This list does not consider fielding.  Dye, Jeter, and Pujols are probably equivalent in terms of fielding.  Ortiz and Howard are way down the list.  The NL MVP race should be a cinch for Pujols.  In the AL, it’s a horse race. 

No pitcher is really in the mix.


#1    Mike529      (see all posts) 2006/09/03 (Sun) @ 21:02

Dye, Jeter, and Pujols are probably equivalent in terms of fielding.
If you aren’t making the position adjustments on defense you have to make them on offense, something WPA doesn’t do.


#2    tangotiger      (see all posts) 2006/09/03 (Sun) @ 21:12

I don’t believe in making “positional adjustment on hitting”.  It’s one of those silly things that people do because it’s nice and easy.

When I said they are equivalent in fielding, I meant in terms of their fielding talent and position.  So, a below-average SS and an above-average 1B would be equivalent. 

The average-SS to average-1B fielding gap is about 15 runs.  So, if you have a 1B that is 7 or 8 runs above average, and a SS that is 7 or 8 runs below average, they are in effect equivalent, fielding-wise.


#3    john      (see all posts) 2006/09/04 (Mon) @ 08:47

What about Beltran in the NL...his WPA is only at 4.81 but plays CF while howard and pujols play 1B


#4    Guy      (see all posts) 2006/09/04 (Mon) @ 09:05

Beltran and Cabrera both have good claims—perhaps better than Howard’s—if you look at context-neutral offensive production.  And I would argue you should.

If you ARE going to look at WPA, you have to credit Howard with the fact that he has more playing time, so probably deserves credit for another .5 wins or so. 

Tango:  is there a WPA leaderboard somewhere, or do you have to look up players team-by-team?


#5    tangotiger      (see all posts) 2006/09/04 (Mon) @ 09:26

I obviously wasn’t doing anything exhaustive, and simply took the top 5 that FAngraphs.com publishes.  In the case of Beltran, his fielding would be worth at least one win above Pujols’.


#6    tangotiger      (see all posts) 2006/09/04 (Mon) @ 12:20

Pujols has 14.8 WA and 7.4 LA

Howard is at 15.8 WA and 9.5 LA

In order for Pujols to catch up to Howard, he has to add 1.0 WA and 2.1 LA.

The replacement level for a hitter is .464 of WA/(WA+LA).  So, Pujols’ replacement, given 3.1 GA, would have done 1.4 WA and 1.7 LA.

That puts Pujols still at +0.8 wins above Howard, just on hitting.

And, Pujols is likely a win above Howard, fielding-wise.


#7    Top      (see all posts) 2006/09/04 (Mon) @ 13:05

Tom - Pujols and jeter equivalent on fielding ??? I don’t get it.


#8    tangotiger      (see all posts) 2006/09/04 (Mon) @ 13:17

Assume Pujols is 7 runs above the average 1B, fielding-wise.

Assume Jeter is 7 runs BELOW the average SS, fielding-wise.

Assume that, if you move the average SS to 1B, he’d be 14 runs above the average 1B.  Or, if you move the average 1B to SS, he’d be 14 runs below the average SS.

Work it out. 
#1: Jeter = Avg SS - 7
#2: Pujols = Avg 1B + 7
#3: 14 = Avg SS - Avg 1B

The 1st question is:
Avg SS = Jeter + 7
The 3rd equation is:
Avg SS = Avg 1b + 14

That makes it:
Jeter + 7 = avg 1b + 14
Jeter = avg 1b + 7

Which matches equation #2.

I don’t know what Pujols and Jeter are fielding-wise, but it’s fair to say that they are equivalent.


#9    David Smyth      (see all posts) 2006/09/04 (Mon) @ 15:21

Using the WSh stats on the HBT for def. WSh, and using the James “short-form” method of figuring Wsh (which assumes every defender is avg, I believe), Jeter comes out at -.37 WAA, and Pujols at +.09, relative to avg players at their positions. Prorating Tango’s 14 run difference (per 162 GP, I’m assuming), and I wind up with Jeter at +.19, and Pujols at -.42, relative to an avg fielder. So, about a .6 win difference, in favor of the SS.


#10    David Smyth      (see all posts) 2006/09/04 (Mon) @ 15:24

Using this sort of analysis, and adding it to WPA, I think it’s Jeter in the AL, and pretty much a dead heat between Beltran and Pujols in the NL.

Unless Wsh is wrong about Jeter’s D and he is sucking like he used to…


#11    Top      (see all posts) 2006/09/04 (Mon) @ 15:40

Well Tom, I don’t know how much of a fan you are of BP’S stats - But they have Pujols 14 runs above average, jeter at -2.


#12    MGL      (see all posts) 2006/09/04 (Mon) @ 15:55

I have not updated since the ASB, but then Jeter was at -13 per 150 games in UZR, about what we would expect.  Of course, since you are using WPA for offense, you should the use the equivalent on defense.  I’ve never seen anyone compute a defensive WPA but it can be easily done if you have the PPB data of course.

And you can argue all day long about what stats or metric to use for an MVP award, but I cannot see any legitimat argument for using a “context-neutral” measure of offensive performance, as an MVP is very much by definition NOT context neutral.  In the past, ONLY something that, in some way, shape or form, helps a team win, has ANY value whatsoever.  A home run in the 9th inning of a 10-0 blowout has no value and should not be considered in an MVP award.  To some extent it does, because the voters are going to look at a player’s stats at the end of the year and they are not going to remember exactly which ones did or did not contribute to a win or at least contribute towards giving a team a chance to win.


#13    tangotiger      (see all posts) 2006/09/04 (Mon) @ 18:12

Top, BP’s stats are saying they are equivalent, then!

Pujols being 14 runs above the average 1B, and Jeter being 2 runs below the average SS, and since the average SS is around 15 runs better than the average 1B, that makes them equivalent!


#14    Top      (see all posts) 2006/09/04 (Mon) @ 18:32

Tom - I had realized that after I already posted it.  My mistake.  Be that as it may, if and when I buy your book, do I HAVE to pay by credit card and not by check ?


#15    tangotiger      (see all posts) 2006/09/04 (Mon) @ 18:55

You can send a check or money order (23.90$) to:
TMA PRESS
PO BOX 21
FLORHAM PARK, NJ 07932-0021


Page 1 of 1 pages


Name (required)
E-Mail (optional)
Website (optional)

<< Back to main


Latest...

COMMENTS

Jan 08 04:25
Sabermetric Moves of the 2009 Pre-Season

Jan 09 02:23
Cheers

Jan 08 23:45
The first Hardball Times Annual available for download!

Jan 08 21:16
Line Drives

Jan 08 20:23
(recent) Historical WAR on Fangraphs

Jan 08 16:07
Clint Eastwood is Archie Bunker

Jan 08 16:06
Hardball Times Annual 2008, starring…

Jan 08 15:58
Madoff’s Ponzi

Jan 08 03:41
Valuing relievers

Jan 07 17:41
The latest in park factors