THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

<< Back to main

Monday, March 15, 2010

Morgan Ensberg, saberist

By Tangotiger, 11:55 AM

Ensberg says:

What’s my point?

Eckstein’s hit in the “5–6″ hole was the difference in the game.  I was not positioned properly at third base.

Why does it matter?

If Eckstein get’s on base, Lidge had to face the lefty Edmonds. In 2004 and 2005, Edmonds hit 4 home runs into the left field Crawford Boxes.  Behind Edmonds is Pujols, the best hitter the game has ever seen.

Positioning of fielders

Position is vital in baseball.  The key is to align your fielders according to the spray chart.  If the pitcher’s plan does not line up with the defense, the batter has a greater chance to get a hit in that vacated spot.

This is a spray chart from 2005 (put in 2005 and Minute Maid Park) showing every location Eckstein hit a baseball at Minute Maid Park.  With the Cardinals down 2 runs, we are certain that he will take a strike (I will explain that reason another day) because even if he hits a hr, they are still down by 1 run.  Sometimes power hitters are allowed to “swing away” if a hr can tie a game. That means that Eckstein will be working with just 2 strikes against a closer throwing close to 100 mph. Knowing that, his swing will be shorter and he will be trying to make contact which lessens his chances of pulling a ball down the line.

Viewpoint

But you should know that there is a optical illusion at Minute Maid Park. Phil Garner (manager) sits in the first chair of the dugout protected by the handicap elevator in the first base dugout. From his vantage point, it looks like the third baseman is directly inline with him.  However, the view from the third baseman’s vantage point is off to the left by about 5 feet.  This is a problem.

Garner is lining me up according to the spray chart, but I am not where he thinks he is moving me.  I am actually closer to the line then he would want due to the illusion but there is nothing that can be done.  From his view I am in the exact spot that I need to be.

Why didn’t you move closer to the hole then?

1.  You do what the manager says. He has the spray charts in front of him.  Managers use that information as a starting point and move players according to the pitcher’s plan against the batter.

2.  With that said, I believe he is adjusting me according to Lidge’s plan against Eckstein.

So how do you know you were positioned wrong?

If a ball is hit where the chart says, then the positioning was wrong.  Phil knew where Eckstein usually hits the ball and knew how Lidge would pitch Eckstein.  Phil took those 2 points into consideration and moved me to the exact location on the chart that he wanted me.

Conclusion

Now that I am positioned, we look back at the match–up.  Lidge is a power pitcher who was touching 100 mph and throwing a slider at close to 92 mph.  At those speeds hitters can’t help but hit the ball up the middle or the other way (opposite field).  Phil will move me off the line but he will stop me a couple feet short of his intended target.  If Phil’s view wasn’t off–set, I could have made the play and the game would have been over. Lidge throws a fast ball that Eckstein hits in the “5-6″ hole for a base hit.

Two batters later, Pujols makes history and there is no optical illusion involved there at all.

Glove-slap: berselius.


#1    Tangotiger      (see all posts) 2010/03/15 (Mon) @ 12:08

I’m reading his blog.

Wow.  Just, wow.  A fantastic read, great presentation, cool insights.  I love it.

More Morgan Ensberg and less Harold Reynolds.

Are you kidding me?  I love this guy already.


#2    Rally      (see all posts) 2010/03/15 (Mon) @ 12:32

Absolutely great stuff.  I’d love to read more about how real teams use the data available to make game decisions.  WAR, UZR, FIP, all that stuff is macro.  Can help a GM decide who to sign or something like that.  Give me more micro.  What do teams use data for that actually affects the way the game is played.


#3    Peter Jensen      (see all posts) 2010/03/15 (Mon) @ 12:50

I don’t think this is a case of Morgan being a saberist.  I think he is teaching us what it is like to be a modern major league baseball player.  I agree with Rally.  The more of this kind of information we can get, the better we will understand the intricacies of the game.  Perhaps it will help us to make our analysis better.  Perhaps it will help us to understand the limitations of what we can do with our analysis when we aren’t privy to all the information the teams are using.  Either way we benefit.

What we really need are more SABR oriented press pass qualified reporters with access to players and managers that will ask these kind of questions.  I bet some recently retired players would spend an entire day talking about how baseball is played if they were asked the right questions by someone who was genuinely interested in what they knew.


#4    rfs1962      (see all posts) 2010/03/15 (Mon) @ 13:21

I was at that game. I had a terrific view of that home run as it soared over the wall and the Crawford Boxes, shot past the train, punched a hole in the roof and headed off into the stratosphere.

For an instant I thought: “Maybe it’s foul.”

Love all the thinking here, though. I wonder whether the positioning of fielders should be numerical in some way to avoid that optical illusion.


#5    Wells      (see all posts) 2010/03/15 (Mon) @ 14:04

Ensberg’s been making some great posts, but dude seriously needs some font size assistance. Thank ye gods for RSS feeds.


#6    Greg Rybarczyk      (see all posts) 2010/03/15 (Mon) @ 14:06

I like Ensberg’s candor and obvious blogging enthusiasm - I hope he can sustain the pace!

On the topic of positioning, I doubt it’s legal, but if you knew exactly where you wanted your outfielders, and it mattered enough to you to have them positioned precisely, you could line up a couple of directional lights so they cross over the spot where you want the guy to stand, so the fielder would just find the spot where he can see both lights.  Setup a pair of lights for each OF, and make it so they can be adjusted via a program on someone’s laptop for each hitter, or even each pitch. (This from my former occupation - most Navy navigation is based on lines of position)

Or if that’s illegal (and it probably is), I have an alternate, legal version of this that would be just as precise, only requiring that the dugout be able to flash some signs to the outfielders…

For infielders, a simple relative positioning from the bag ought to do it, although this example seems to be one where it didn’t…


#7    berselius      (see all posts) 2010/03/15 (Mon) @ 14:17

Ensberg’s previous post defending Milton Bradley was a great read too - and Ensberg has been very good about replying to his commenters. Speaking as a frustrated Cubs fan who watched the media and the fans pile on Bradley all season, it was quite refreshing to see Ensberg and a majority of the commenters not dismissing him as a deranged lunatic.


#8    Nick Steiner      (see all posts) 2010/03/16 (Tue) @ 02:22

Well Ensberg is decidedly not a saberist (for instance, when I asked him about how much he feels luck plays a role in stats and whether or not he actually plays better during his hot streaks, he said there is no such thing as luck in baseball), but he is incredibly insightful as to the other aspects of the game.  And he replies to EVERY question you ask him.  This really is an amazing opportunity for us to explore more honest insider insights like the stuff with Chipper Jones.  Hopefully Morgan doesn’t become too overwhelmed.


#9    MGL      (see all posts) 2010/03/16 (Tue) @ 06:33

Actually, the reason he is good, but not that good, is that he has a very Jewish name, but is actually Christian. wink


#10    Peter Jensen      (see all posts) 2010/03/16 (Tue) @ 08:18

Nick - Ensberg may very well understand saberist concepts but just use a different terminology than you.  Luck has connotations of individuals who have good luck and others that have bad luck.  It is overused by “saberists” and a not very precise way to describe everything from random chance to small sample size error to factors that we do not understand yet. 

One saberist, looking at stats only, would describe Eckstein’s hit as a “lucky” hit that threaded the needle between 3d and short.  Another, looking at different data, might attribute it to Ensberg’s lack of range.  Another, looking at a third set of data, might conclude that the pitcher missed his spot and allowed the ball to be hit harder than normal.  Ensberg, with his insider knowledge of what the pitcher was trying to accomplish and what his coaches knew and were trying to act on in the way of positioning and what his capabilities were as a fielder, concludes that he would have made the play if he had positioned himself correctly.  All of these explanations may actually contain portions of the “truth”.  However, the more information that a person has about a situation the more likely he is to be able to attribute the outcome to causal factors rather than “luck”.


#11    Tangotiger      (see all posts) 2010/03/16 (Tue) @ 08:35

He definitely understands luck, because he wrote something about not to worry about outcomes, and instead focus on process.


#12    Rally      (see all posts) 2010/03/16 (Tue) @ 09:19

"Actually, the reason he is good, but not that good, is that he has a very Jewish name, but is actually Christian.”

Cool that this post concerns David Eckstein then.  We’ve got the left side of the infield set for the “Confused for Jews” allstar team.


#13    MGL      (see all posts) 2010/03/16 (Tue) @ 12:06

It would be interesting to put together the “all-confused for Jews” team.  Mike Benjamin, Mike Mordechai, John Lowenstein, Mike Liberthal, Walt Weiss, Ryne Sandberg…


#14    MGL      (see all posts) 2010/03/16 (Tue) @ 13:57

After reading this childish post on his blog:

http://morganensberg.wordpress.com/2010/03/07/how-to-hit-a-batter-zito-vs-fielder/

I’m not all that keen on this guy…


Page 1 of 1 pages


Name (required)
E-Mail (optional; WILL be published)
Website (optional)

<< Back to main


Latest...

COMMENTS

Feb 11 23:23
Reader Mail of the Day: Why do we need X years of fielding data?  And what about outliers?

Feb 11 22:49
Clutch analogy

Feb 11 22:08
Who is Jeremy Lin?

Feb 11 20:11
Fighting leads to goals?

Feb 11 19:55
Why do players get crappy caps?

Feb 11 19:12
Hero of the month: Brittney Baxter

Feb 11 17:59
MGL: Today on Clubhouse Confidential

Feb 11 10:29
Dwight Evans

Feb 11 02:12
Performance through the ages

Feb 10 23:01
For Your Soul