THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews
If you are a media member and would like a review copy of The Book, please contact Kevin Cuddihy of Potomac Books.

Buy The Book from Amazon

MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

<< Back to main

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

Mo, Bill James, and me

By Tangotiger, 03:49 PM

Bill James posted Mariano’s seasonal Win Shares - Loss Shares, whereby he gives him a total of 136 Win Shares and 24 Loss Shares.  I replied:


Mariano’s 136-24 WS/LS means that he has 45.3 wins and 8 losses.  That gives him 53.3 game slices.  If you take Mariano’s IP, divided by the Yanks team IP, multiply by 0.35 times the number of team games played, Mariano gets 37.4 game slices.  We need to leverage those.  The typical closer gets his peformance to affect the game twice as much as the standard pitcher, “pound per pound”.  He had time as a starter and setup guy, so let’s figure he should have about 65 game slices.  From this little viewpoint, it looks like WS/LS doesn’t give closers the right balance.

45.3 wins and 8 losses means that Mariano is +18.7 wins above average (a .500 pitcher would have gone 26.6 - 26.6).

According to Fangraphs.com: http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=844&position=P
Using the change in Win Expectancy states (Win Probability Added), Mariano is +43 wins.

Even unleveraged, if you look at Baseball-Reference.com, he has a 2.30 ERA in a league/park of 4.54 with 1000 innings (including 2008).  A simple runs above average gives you that he is +2.24 runs per 9 inning above average, which over 1000 innings is +249 runs, or close to +25 wins.

His WPA/LI at Fangraphs (which is Situational Wins, without the extra effect of the leverage) is +26 wins.

At this point, it looks to me like WS/LS doesn’t fairly value the effect of Mariano Rivera’s regular season.

#1    Guillermo      (see all posts) 2008/07/23 (Wed) @ 19:25

You divided the win shares twice.

136 - 24 = 112 / 3 = + 37.5 Wins

Isn’t it?


#2    tangotiger      (see all posts) 2008/07/23 (Wed) @ 20:31

No. 

If a team win 100 games and loses 62, BJ will give out 300 win shares and 186 loss shares.  So, first you divide by 3 to get 100 and 62.

Then, you figure out what an average player/team would do, which is 81-81.  So, this team is +19 wins above average.

300 minus 186 divided by 6 is 19.

***

So, 136 minus 24 divided by 6 is 18.7.

This would be even clearer once you see more players beyond Mo.

And Mo should have LOTS of negative loss shares.  Dude has the best rate stats, basically, ever.  If he doesn’t earn a negative loss share for any season, that must mean that there may be only a handful in the history.

And yet, Derek Jeter has a season with negative loss shares.

Win Shares, v1, did not do a good job with pitchers, and I get the feeling it won’t do a good job now.


#3    tangotiger      (see all posts) 2008/07/23 (Wed) @ 20:33

I should correct that Jeter’s negative loss shares season was only for his hitting.


Page 1 of 1 pages


Name (required)
E-Mail (optional)
Website (optional)

<< Back to main


Latest...

COMMENTS

Jan 08 04:25
Sabermetric Moves of the 2009 Pre-Season

Jan 09 02:33
Cheers

Jan 08 23:45
The first Hardball Times Annual available for download!

Jan 08 21:16
Line Drives

Jan 08 20:23
(recent) Historical WAR on Fangraphs

Jan 08 16:07
Clint Eastwood is Archie Bunker

Jan 08 16:06
Hardball Times Annual 2008, starring…

Jan 08 15:58
Madoff’s Ponzi

Jan 08 03:41
Valuing relievers

Jan 07 17:41
The latest in park factors