THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

<< Back to main

Wednesday, December 30, 2009

Mike Silva Chronicles - Part 10: Future

By Tangotiger, 01:18 PM

Where do you see advanced metrics in 10 years? Fad? Major part of a front office operation? Replace traditional scouting?

Fad?  You haven’t seen anything yet.  Wait until PITCHf/x, FIELDf/x, and HITf/x take shape.  You will wish and pray to get back to the simpler times of 2000s.  The 2010s will bring an avalanche of data.  It will absolutely be a major part of the front office.  The best-case scenario is that you have all these f/x systems set up at colleges and high schools.  Instead of one scout seeing one game of some prospect in one town, while missing a game on another town, you will have every single pitch charted, every swing charted, and every single fielder charted.  The question is to try to identify all of the contributions of each player to each pitch and each play.  Having a summary opinion without evidence is bullsh!t.  Scouts have summary opinion on limited amount of data (say they see 5% of someone’s games in college).  That’s valuable.  Now, imagine having a summary opinion based on 100% of the data?

And no, it will never replace traditional scouting, because as I said, you will always need two lenses to your glasses.  It will certainly make him more efficient.  Instead of seeing 5% of each player’s games, maybe he will see 30% of the games that the f/x system is high on, and only 2% for the less-than-stellar players.  It’s another tool they can add, in addition to their radar gun.

If the goal of this industry is not to advance it monetarily or its role in MLB, then why have it? What’s the point? It seems like a very time consuming hobby with little reward.

The hobby itself is its own reward.  You may as well ask the millions of bloggers why they blog.  Those things also consume time.  Why do you go watch a movie?  Why do you have dinner with friends?  In those cases, you actually pay with money to get your reward.  In this case, the payment is time.  And, we are more than happy to give it, especially if others also give their time.  We all benefit.

Making money and having a role in MLB is a byproduct.  I wrote The Book, and I spent several hundred hours on it, if not 1000 hours.  And I made less than minimum wage.  Based on your line of thinking, I’m crazy and stupid.  Yes, you are probably right.  But, that doesn’t mean I shouldn’t have done it, nor does it mean that others did not get a bigger benefit of it than I did.  Yes, I’d have loved it if we had sold a million copies rather than 1 percent of that, so I could turn my hobby into a full-time profession.  But this is true of anyone who has a hobby. It’s ideal if your hobby and your living can merge.  But you are not going to stop your hobby if you can’t make money out of it.  Your hobby is all about trading time for enjoyment.  My job is what I do.  My hobby is who I am. 


#1    dylanj      (see all posts) 2009/12/30 (Wed) @ 13:42

Thanks for this Tango. Really a great read.


#2    Steve Sommer      (see all posts) 2009/12/30 (Wed) @ 13:49

I enjoyed reading through the entire series, but especially enjoyed these closing two paragraphs.  If anyone ever asks me why I “waste” so much time on this stuff I’m simply going to point them to those two paragraphs.


#3          (see all posts) 2009/12/30 (Wed) @ 14:13

Excellent closing statement. My feelings exactly.

And i would add something more as a reader… the learning process.

It is enjoyable because we all love baseball, but we are really getting an education out of this. Not only are we able to understand bayes logic or apply and understand simple regression models (Not an expert by any means, but i now get it, i had two semesters of “Experimental design” in college and i learned a lot more from reading your work than any class).

And, the most important aspect… the collaboration. Really, discussing this topics with people for all over the world. It’s very rewarding.


#4    Michael      (see all posts) 2009/12/30 (Wed) @ 14:35

Thanks for the series Tango, and thanks to Mike for asking the questions and inquiring rather than doing something most of the traditional mainstream media types refuse to do. Most of the questions asked were legitimate concerns of those not heavily involved in the sabermetric community, and it was nice to hear someone ask them and someone answer them as clearly as Tango did.

I agree with Steve/#3, I get that question all the time, and I don’t even do the hardcore stuff. It’s something I enjoy, and I’d gladly pay the time to do it, if I have it.


#5    James K.      (see all posts) 2009/12/30 (Wed) @ 14:36

Great closing.  Not everyone is motivated by the almighty dollar and people do things just because they enjoy them.  The same “what’s the point?” question could be asked of Mr. Silva about his blogging.

While I enjoy this series as an education tool for those who are unfamiliar with some sabermetric, it should be noted that many, myself included, have publicly and privately reached out to Mr. Silva to ask any questions about sabermetrics he has.  An example:

http://www.amazinavenue.com/2009/8/7/979715/you-always-fear-what-you-dont

He’s been saber-trolling for months now and, despite offers to explain these concepts he very clearly misunderstands, he just kept up the uninformed trolling.  He now claims that this kind of “discourse” is what he’s all about, which couldn’t be further from the truth.  Whatever.  I expect another page hitzzz inducing troll post from him within a month or so.  If not, then great, maybe this series helped.


#6          (see all posts) 2009/12/30 (Wed) @ 15:08

"It seems like a very time consuming hobby with little reward.”

i say that to myself whenever i consider my sister in law’s pet rabbits.  THAT, is a crazy hobby, IMHO.

doesnt seem all that crazy, tho, when you consider utility and not bucks as the ultimate reward.  money is just a means to an end after all.


#7    Tangotiger      (see all posts) 2009/12/30 (Wed) @ 15:15

I’m of the opinion that the bashing should only start after the education.  I can accept that Silva was uneducated, so there’s no reason to bash on his ignorance.  If he’s willfully ignorant, that’s another question.

So, I think he’s now in the position to make an informed opinion.  If he continues to misrepresent things, then you can rightfully give him that metaphorical bloody nose.


#8    GTWMA      (see all posts) 2009/12/30 (Wed) @ 19:49

I’d also like to thank you, Tom.  You did a fantastic job answering all ten questions, and any reasonable person with an open mind should be better able to understand the sabrmetric community because of that.


#9    Patrick      (see all posts) 2009/12/31 (Thu) @ 02:05

Tom,

I agree completely with GTWMA.

These are very good, very thorough, very gentle (as in, solidly, logically constructed, rarely forceful in language because they don’t need to be) answers to some rather interesting questions.

They were a pleasure to read, as your writing usually is.

And I especially like the last two paragraphs…

Thanks!


#10    Jud      (see all posts) 2009/12/31 (Thu) @ 02:23

This final question from Mike Silva astonishes and saddens me on 2 levels:

1) That someone can think in 2010 (almost) that advanced statistics is a fad is quite amazing. To think that gaining a deeper understanding of how runs are generated and avoided, how games are won and lost is “just a fad”, and does not have real monetary value to teams that operate multi-million businesses, come on!
2) Even worse is his follow up question. Behind the 2nd portion of his question lies the assumption that the only human pursuits that interest us are those that provide us with financial gain. I find this outlook appalling.
In any case, your answers are truly excellent. It reminds me, in a sense, of G.H Hardy’s wonderful book “A Mathematician’s Apology” in which he explains why he loves mathematics and spends his life on it.


#11    GTWMA      (see all posts) 2009/12/31 (Thu) @ 10:20

I agree with your second point, Jud. This seems to be a theme in several of Mike’s questions and blog posts.  It seems odd to me because there are so many examples and plenty of evidence in support of Tom’s views dating back to the old USENET and even before that.  While there certainly are people in the community focused on the monetary value (and certainly more than in the past, now that more recognize its monetary value), the sabrmetric community still bears a significant resemblence to a scholarly community that seeks and shares a lot of knowledge for its own value.

If you’ve ever heard a scientist describe the moment they realized a new discovery, it’s hard for me to think that you can be human and not feel that sense of wonder.  And, I know I had that some feeling (Ok, maybe not exactly the same) but something like that feeling reading Voros’ article on FIP.  My initial reaction, probably like many others, was along the lines of “Holy $#!+, that can’t be true, but it’s amazing if it is.” And, to see that discovery largely hold up, and help me better understand how pitching and defense combine to prevent runs in baseball is worth a lot more than money to me.


#12    Terry      (see all posts) 2009/12/31 (Thu) @ 19:26

****If the goal of this industry is not to advance it monetarily or its role in MLB, then why have it? What’s the point? It seems like a very time consuming hobby with little reward.****

A particularly ironic question given the time you spend answering the list!  tongue laugh


#13    Tangotiger      (see all posts) 2009/12/31 (Thu) @ 20:10

Great point!  I probably spent 2-3 hours writing all those answers.  Based on Mike’s line of questioning, I should have asked him for payment, or ignored his request.


#14    anon      (see all posts) 2010/01/01 (Fri) @ 07:31

and several of us do this stuff at work, which could endanger our paycheck if the boss comes into the cubicle at the wrong moment


#15    Tangotiger      (see all posts) 2010/01/01 (Fri) @ 11:59

Absolutely.


#16    Steve Sommer      (see all posts) 2010/01/01 (Fri) @ 12:14

Eh, I figure it’s professional development right?  Spreadsheets, databases, etc.  those are useful skills smile


Page 1 of 1 pages


Name (required)
E-Mail (optional)
Website (optional)

<< Back to main


Latest...

COMMENTS

Aug 31 15:28
Fans Scouting Report: Update

Sep 02 14:26
Mail: rWAR v fWAR

Sep 02 14:15
WOWY Teachers

Sep 02 13:37
Who’s Waldo?

Sep 02 13:00
It’s hard to beat the crowd (Vegas in this case) no matter how smart you think you are

Sep 02 12:05
Could Rob Dibble have been a comp for Strasburg?

Sep 02 08:36
Team Elin

Sep 02 01:19
Can someone tell me why Trevor Hoffman is still allowed to pitch?

Sep 01 23:16
Strasburg II

Sep 01 22:11
PITCHf/x Summit 2010 - Recaps