THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

<< Back to main

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

James Player Rater 1994

By Tangotiger, 03:34 PM

Carson compiles the Bill James data to see how he did.  He was also nice enough to send me his file, on which I ran a regression of James’ dollar values and their eventual WAR.  The correlation was r=.60, which, I dunno, sounds high for something like this.

The regression equation is this:

expected WAR = 1.3 * James$ minus 16

Take for example James’ highest rated player: Cliff Floyd at 44$.  That would translate to an expected WAR of 41 (basically Jim Rice or Dave Parker).  Floyd got 27 WAR.  He also had Chipper at 40$, meaning 36 WAR, and he’s at 86 and counting. 

If you take James’ top 10 rated players, they averaged 36$, which means an expected 31 WAR for their career, and they got 39 WAR.

Working backwards, in order to estimate Chipper at 86 WAR, his James$ should have been 78$.

Anyway, just fascinating stuff, and I will make my plea for all forecasters to please release your historical data to us researchers.  Anything more than ten years old.  It’s useless to you, and a goldmine to us.


#1    Tangotiger      (see all posts) 2011/01/18 (Tue) @ 15:51

That was a linear regression.  If I did it exponential, I get r=.66 with this equation:

WAR = .04 * James^2 - .46 * James

So, the 36$ player comes in at an expected 35 WAR, which is a good improvement over the linear method.


#2    Peter      (see all posts) 2011/01/18 (Tue) @ 17:39

Trying again, I think my comment got caught in the spam filter.

This is cool stuff, but my reaction to this and to Carson’s original post was that it needed a graph. See http://awaygames.wordpress.com/2011/01/18/rating-the-raters-bill-james-1994/ for the post I just put up--I think the interpretation of this data changes a bit when you see it visualized. Short version: It looks like James’s dollar valuations are really only informative for the top prospects (A or B grade).


Page 1 of 1 pages


Name (required)
E-Mail (optional; WILL be published)
Website (optional)

<< Back to main


Latest...

COMMENTS

Feb 23 01:15
How much should minor leaguers make?

Feb 22 22:31
Not everything you learn in college is true (duh)…

Feb 22 17:27
Would you cut to a regularly scheduled show, if the main event ran long?

Feb 22 17:02
This week in chart failure

Feb 22 16:26
Who’s evaluating the 2011 forecasts this year?

Feb 22 12:21
MLB 2012 Odds: BetOnline

Feb 22 07:11
K minus BB differential or ratio?

Feb 22 01:18
Two players have the same stats: one is much younger.  Which one will be better next year?

Feb 21 14:49
Knuckleball pitchers: all of them

Feb 21 13:57
Proper compensation for Epstein?