THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews
If you are a media member and would like a review copy of The Book, please contact Kevin Cuddihy of Potomac Books.

Buy The Book from Amazon

MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

<< Back to main

Thursday, October 09, 2008

Inside the Mind of a Manager

By , 11:03 PM

OK, he’s not really a manager, but he certainly could be one.  In fact, I think that he is as smart, knowledgeable, and experienced as most managers in baseball.  Don’t get me wrong.  I am not, by any means, touting his qualifications to be a good manager.  Only that he seems to me to have to have the mindset of a typical manager.  And I think that most baseball insiders would agree with me on that.


In the bottom of the 7th, with the pitcher’s spot coming up, there is a runner on first and no outs.  At first Manuel had Dobbs in the on-deck circle ready to pinch hit.  Then when Ruiz, the batter, reaches base, he decides to pinch hit Taguchi, obviously to bunt.  Let’s set aside for a second that that is a bad play by Manuel for the following reason:  As I have said a million (maybe only a thousand) times here and in other forums, when there is the possibility of the sacrifice bunt, your ONLY edge is if the defense does not know whether you are going to bunt or not.  Once you give it away, one, the bunt almost always decreases your WE, and two, if you don’t bunt (but still give it away), the defense can play back, thus reducing the batter’s chance of a hit.  But that is not the issue here.

The person I am referring to, the “faux manager” analyzes the situation.  (I am paraphrasing.) He says, “I would not have bunted there. First of all, you have the best pinch hitter in baseball in Dobbs.  Second of all, it is the 7th inning and you have a one-run lead - you want to play for the big inning and not one run.”

O.K.

In the top of the 8th, with 1 out, and no one on, Madson is pitching to Manny.  This “manager,” says, “The right strategy, I would think, is to throw him inside fastballs.  We’ll see (what Madson does).”

Honestly, I think that this person is a perfect proxy for a typical manager.  Do me a favor (not directed towards anyone in particular).  The next time I or anyone else criticize a manager’s decision-making process, please don’t tell me, “But the manager knows things that you don’t.” Please.  Ever.

#1          (see all posts) 2008/10/10 (Fri) @ 02:54

And I could never understand, if you want to sacrifice, why pinch hit? Let the pitcher bunt, or another pitcher who’s a better bunter. Save your pinch hitter for a better situation.


#2          (see all posts) 2008/10/10 (Fri) @ 07:20

So, as I see it, if someone agrees with your analysis, they are good manager material?

But if they go against your wisdom then they are some sort of bozo who doesn’t know what he’s doing?

It’s really amazing that anyone was able to win pennants or championships before sabermetrics came along. Since none of them knew what they were doing, how did anyone ever win?


#3    Bjorn      (see all posts) 2008/10/10 (Fri) @ 07:32

I think that without a doubt the manager DOES know things that we don’t, the question should be if that knowledge is important enough to make a difference and if he is using it wisely.

As for comment #2, even if no one knows what they are doing (not neccesarilly that I think that they don’t), someone HAS to win!


#4    MGL      (see all posts) 2008/10/10 (Fri) @ 07:55

So, as I see it, if someone agrees with your analysis, they are good manager material?

But if they go against your wisdom then they are some sort of bozo who doesn’t know what he’s doing?

That is 100% correct!

Assuming you don’t care about “wasting” a pinch hitter, a position player has a much better result than a pitcher on a sac bunt attempt, on the average.  The reason is that the pitcher gets many fewer singles and reached on errors (because he is slower, a worse bunter perhaps, the defense can play even further up, and he is still going to bunt with 2 strikes).

Not to mention the fact that, this case (Taguchi) not withstanding, if a manager pinch hits with a pitcher in order to sacrifice, he is telegraphing the sacrifice nearly 100%.  With a position player at bat, the defense can never play as aggressively because they are not 100% sure that the batter is going to bunt and if they play too aggressively, a smart manager will take off the bunt and have the batter swing away or do a “slug bunt” or “butcher boy” play.


#5    Eric Seidman      (see all posts) 2008/10/10 (Fri) @ 11:10

My exact quote to the Philly bar patrons surrounding me: “What!?  If you’re bringing Taguchi up it’s no different than Hamels, because they know he’ll be bunting; after all, he hasn’t played in weeks and they clearly have better options on the bench.  With Maddux on the mound, why the hell wouldn’t you bring Dobbs in?  Even if they resort to Beimel or whomever, then bring Coste in!  Or, if you wanted to do a bunt but keep the defense on their toes, use Bruntlett, who is going to come into the game anyway.”

This echoed the sentiments of just about everyone in the bar, even those who don’t even know that sabermetrics is a word.


#6    MGL      (see all posts) 2008/10/10 (Fri) @ 14:55

The comments about the bunt are obviously silly.  The reason I mentioned the Manny thing is that with a one-run lead in the 8th with no one on base, you typically are not going to pitch inside for fear of allowing the tying HR.


#7    Bill B.      (see all posts) 2008/10/19 (Sun) @ 07:30

Not that I disagree with your analysis, but the Phillies had great success against Ramirez in the regular season by pitching inside to him. I don’t know what % of the time they did so against him in the NLCS, but I don’t think it was very high.

I’d have pitched inside to him until he made the adjustment.

I just caught this post, sorry for bringing it up almost 10 days later. tongue laugh


Page 1 of 1 pages


Name (required)
E-Mail (optional)
Website (optional)

<< Back to main


Latest...

COMMENTS

Nov 20 01:43
Sabermetric Moves of the 2009 Pre-Season

Nov 20 09:12
David G. checks in again on whether experience matters in the post-season

Nov 20 04:02
Nate Silver: hero to interviewers

Nov 20 02:01
My 1B is better than your 1B

Nov 20 00:26
MLB logo

Nov 19 23:03
NBA’s Marcel

Nov 19 19:13
Offense by position groups by decade

Nov 19 17:32
Changes in home run rates during the Retrosheet years

Nov 19 16:40
One Year and One Million Hits Later

Nov 19 16:22
Soria as a starter?