THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews
If you are a media member and would like a review copy of The Book, please contact Kevin Cuddihy of Potomac Books.

Buy The Book from Amazon

MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

<< Back to main

Thursday, February 14, 2008

How to calculate Marcels, day-by-day

By Tangotiger, 05:58 PM

If you look at Pujols’ Marcels, his reliability (r) is .87.  The league average PA that is added to all players is 1200 PA.  This equation is true:
r = PA / (PA+1200)

Since we know r for Pujols, we solve for PA and we get 8031.  That’s how we can infer Pujols’ weighted PA of 2005-2007.  If you wanted to figure this out yourself, you take 5 times his PA in 2007, 4 times in 2006, and 3 times in 2005.  You’ll get a number very close to 8031.  (It should be exact, except for rounding.)

Instead of using weights of 5/4/3 (and 1200 PA for league average), let’s divide everything by 5, so we have weights of 1/0.8/0.6 (and 240 PA for league average).  Instead of 8031 being Pujols’ weighted PA of his last 3 years, it’s now 1606.

His Marcel wOBA for 2008 is .421, and is based on 1606 of his PA and 240 of league average PA for a total of 1846 PA.

Now, all we have to do is, game-by-game, include his 2008 performance to these 1846 PA.  If you remember, the weight is:
weight = .9994^daysAgo

In this case,
daysAgo = July 1, 2007 minus gameDate

So, a game played on Jul 1, 2008 will be weighted at 1.25.  A game played on Apr 1, 2008 will be weighted at 1.18.  A game played on Oct 1, 2008 will be weighted at 1.31.

That’s pretty much the process you can follow to get a running day-by-day Marcel.  It won’t be exactly right, but it’ll be close enough.


#1    Colin Wyers      (see all posts) 2008/02/14 (Thu) @ 20:22

Is July 1 an arbitrary date? Sorry if this is a stupid question, but it just seems to come out from nowhere.


#2    tangotiger      (see all posts) 2008/02/14 (Thu) @ 20:44

If it wasn’t clear, each year is 80% of the next year (or, similarly, 125% of the previous).

So, the average of the performance in year 2007 occurred in July 1 2007.

Therefore, the performance exactly on July 1 2008 must be 125% of the weight of the game on July 1 2007 (or the average of Apr 1 2007 to Oct 1 2007).


#3    salb918      (see all posts) 2008/02/14 (Thu) @ 23:38

Because we are dealing with exponentials, it doesn’t really matter where we start the clock, as long as we normalize properly (i.e., if you use 5/4/3 just make sure you divide by 5). Also, you need to keep the number of league average PAs you use straight as well, so if you use 5/4/3 you use 1200 league-average PAs but if you use 1/0.8/0.6 you use 240 league-average PAs.

In the THT article http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/the-running-of-the-monkeys/, I used a formula that integrates to basically the same value as the 5/4/3, so I used 1200 league average PAs.  But if I got rid of the 5.62 prefactor in my weight equation, you would 240 PAs.

It’s really just bookkeeping.


#4    tangotiger      (see all posts) 2008/02/15 (Fri) @ 08:26

Right, exactly.  It’s just a matter of calibration.


Page 1 of 1 pages


Name (required)
E-Mail (optional)
Website (optional)

<< Back to main


Latest...

COMMENTS

Nov 20 01:43
Sabermetric Moves of the 2009 Pre-Season

Nov 20 10:54
David G. checks in again on whether experience matters in the post-season

Nov 20 10:42
Offense by position groups by decade

Nov 20 04:02
Nate Silver: hero to interviewers

Nov 20 02:01
My 1B is better than your 1B

Nov 20 00:26
MLB logo

Nov 19 23:03
NBA’s Marcel

Nov 19 17:32
R.I.P. Tom Boswell, sabermetrician; P.A.L.L.(*) Tom Boswell, human being

Nov 19 16:40
One Year and One Million Hits Later

Nov 19 16:22
Soria as a starter?