THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

<< Back to main

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

How many wins are those dollars buying?

By Tangotiger, 04:12 PM

This is from 1998-2009 (as of July 22).  This is what I did:
1. Figured the team payroll relative to the league average every year.  That’s my team payroll index.

2. Took the average by team. Average is obviously 100%.  Yankees are over 200%.  Marlins at 50%.

3. Figured the team win% for that same time period.  Average is obviously .500.  Yanks at .580.  Royals/Rays at .428.

4. Figured the best-fit linear line: win% = .41 + .09*PayrollIndex .  The correlation coefficient (r) was 0.75.

5. Figured a non-linear best-fit line as: Take the PayrollIndex, and set it to halfway between there an 100%.  So, the Marlins come in at 75% (halfway between 50% and 100%).  That 75% represents the ratio of wins to losses.  So, if you spend at half the league average, you should have 3 wins for every 4 losses (or a .429 win%).

The best-managed team is the Twins, who have a .500 record, but are spending like a .450 team.  The worst is the Orioles who spend like a .510 team, but have an actual .460 record.

Before you ask, the Yanks spend like a .610 team, but have a .580 record. 


#1    Nick      (see all posts) 2009/07/22 (Wed) @ 19:18

Cardinals?


#2    brent      (see all posts) 2009/07/23 (Thu) @ 03:46

Would you list all the teams for everyone, please?


#3    German dude      (see all posts) 2009/07/23 (Thu) @ 04:51

Does that take in to account that the Orioles are playing a lot more games against tougher competition (it doen’t help that you spend like a .510 team if you are playing most of the games against .550 spending teams)?


#4    Tangotiger      (see all posts) 2009/07/24 (Fri) @ 11:39

I wanted to see if this piece, with the team data, can make it to WSJ.  If it can’t then I’ll post it here.  Either way, you’ll see the list by next week.

***

“most of the games against .550 spending teams”

C’mon. 

Yanks spend like a .610 team and the Redsox spend like a .560 team.  So, 22% of their schedule is against these two teams, and the other 78% is against teams in the .430-.550 class.  If I had to guess, the Orioles faced teams spending like .520.


#5          (see all posts) 2009/07/27 (Mon) @ 21:48

I did something similar to this and it is at

http://cybermetric.blogspot.com/2008/05/another-look-at-salaries-and-wins.html

Except I had wins as the dependent variable, not pct. I simply took some data that JC Bradbury had over the 1986-2005 seasons


Page 1 of 1 pages


Name (required)
E-Mail (optional; WILL be published)
Website (optional)

<< Back to main


Latest...

COMMENTS

Feb 12 05:18
Reader Mail of the Day: Why do we need X years of fielding data?  And what about outliers?

Feb 12 04:55
Who is Jeremy Lin?

Feb 12 03:15
New PECOTA

Feb 12 02:42
Whitney Houston

Feb 12 02:23
Psst… wanna intern in Canada?

Feb 12 00:40
Clutch analogy

Feb 11 20:11
Fighting leads to goals?

Feb 11 19:55
Why do players get crappy caps?

Feb 11 19:12
Hero of the month: Brittney Baxter

Feb 11 17:59
MGL: Today on Clubhouse Confidential