THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews
If you are a media member and would like a review copy of The Book, please contact Kevin Cuddihy of Potomac Books.

Buy The Book from Amazon

MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

<< Back to main

Saturday, June 14, 2008

How do you build a bullpen?

By , 07:34 PM

Mark Shapiro, the GM of the Indians, was chatting in the booth today during the CLE/SD game.  He seems like a real smart guy.  The Indians are a very good organization, so that is no surprise.  He was talking about bullpens, and the TV announcers asked him why bullpens were so unpredictable.  His answer was two-fold.  One, he said, that there might be a bounceback effect, whereby relievers who pitch well are overworked and may be less effective the next year, and vice versa for relievers who pitch poorly.  I did a study on that a while ago, which suggested that that is not the case, although, to be honest, I don’t think my conclusions were definitive.  Shapiro did not seem to sure about that either.

The second reason he opined, was right on the money.  He said that because relievers only pitch 70 IP at the most per year, that teams make a lot of mistakes in terms of evaluating them.  While he was on the right track, he also should have mentioned that when we compare bullpen performance from one year to the other, we are comparing two sets of performances both of which have a lot of noise.  By definition, that would create lots of unpredictability.

I have mentioned this concept before, and I think it is an important one:  There is a big difference between 550 IP (about how many IP relievers pitch per team per season) thrown by 10 or 15 guys (the number of relievers per team) and 550 IP thrown by one pitcher, in terms of the variance of performance.  A huge difference actually.  When people think of variance, they tend to focus on the total sample size rather than the sample sizes of each player, where the performance of each of those players is pretty much independent of one another.

Anyway, I am going to answer the question of, “How do you build a bullpen?” which seems to be such a difficult and illusive answer, at least according to baseball insiders.  It is not.  And of course, I am not really sure what they mean by “build a bullpen.”

1) Find halfway decent starting pitchers that you think are also suited or even better suited for relief, and turn them into relievers.

2) Stop rotating relievers in and out of the major leagues, based on short-term performance.  Keep evaluating your reliever projections, including your pitchers in the minors, using sabermetric techniques, and your scouting reports, and use them to determine who stays and who goes.

3) Sort your relievers according to their projections, and make sure that your better relievers get more high leverage situations and that your worse relievers get fewer high leverage and more low leverage situations.

4) Resist the temptation to use your better relievers when you are losing by 4 or 5 runs (or more), on order to “stay in the game” and resist the temptation to use your better relievers when you are up by 4 or 5 runs (or more) for fear of losing the game.  Use your worse relievers in low leverage situations, period.

5) Use you righties and lefties wisely.  In fact, each reliever should NOT have just one projection.  They should have one projection versus RHB and another versus LHB.  Use those to determine who comes in when.  Also, rather than having just an “ERA” type projection for each pitcher, classify pitchers according to high or low K, BB, HR, and GDP (basically G/F ratio).  Use those also to determine who comes in when, depending on the game situation.

6) Of course, us your ace in more IP per season, and use him in multiple innings when you can, and use him any time the leverage is high, regardless of whether it is a save situation or not.

7) Bring in relievers as early and as often as possible, especially when your non-ace starter is on the mound.

That is how you “build” (and use) a bullpen.  It is not that hard.


#1          (see all posts) 2008/06/14 (Sat) @ 23:17

Number 6 is just so blindingly obvious that it makes my head hurt when I think about how it is ignored.


#2          (see all posts) 2008/06/14 (Sat) @ 23:23

I thought #1 was the most obvious one.

Then again, easier said than done


#3          (see all posts) 2008/06/15 (Sun) @ 07:33

I do believe I agree with evertyhing.

The other day Matt Capps had just closed his fourth straight game. The next day John Russell was asked in his daily pregame interview, if Capps was not available, who would close “I can’t say, it would depend on the matchups” Why can’t he say that for every game? If the matchups favor Marte, why bring in Capps just because it’s the 9th and he’s your closer? That is sacrificing WE for orthodoxy.


#4    Jared      (see all posts) 2008/06/15 (Sun) @ 19:27

I agree with all of your points, but I’d like to know your opinion of how many innings a season is too many. This relates to point #7. I know it depends on the pitcher, but have you found a maximum number of innings before pitchers get injured or regress?


#5    MGL      (see all posts) 2008/06/15 (Sun) @ 21:33

Yes, it clearly depends on each individual pitcher.  I have no idea how many innings a reliever can pitch per season.  There is some suggestion in The Book that relievers can pitch more than they do with the same effectiveness.  I would leave that up to the people who run the team.  The issue with reliever use is not so much that they don’t pitch enough innings (although using your closer mainly in save situations and 4-run leads, which is actually becoming more and more common I think - the 4-run lead that it - will necessarily cause you to under-use him), but that they are not leveraged properly.

As I say and show in my simple rules above, it is not that hard to use a bullpen effectively.  But, on order to do that, managers and GM’s would have to learn to resist the forces of human nature that create suboptimal behavior.  That is never going to happen in baseball.  For example, the first or second time a manager does not bring in his closer with a 3-run lead in the 9th, and his team loses, the media and the fans will be clamoring for his head.  The first or second time a manager brings in his worst reliever when ahead by 5 runs in the 7th and they lose the game, the same thing will happen.  Etc.


#6    Jared      (see all posts) 2008/06/16 (Mon) @ 00:48

I can’t count how many times I’ve seen a team bringing in their setup guy in the 8th, even though he’s facing the 3-4-5 hitters and bringing in their closer for the bottom of the order in the 9th. It’s the appeal to antiquity fallacy, that you have to do it that way because it’s always been done that way. I was encouraged that the Brewers and Cardinals have bucked conventional wisdom and batted their pitchers 8th, but the use of bullpens seems to be a harder cycle to break.


#7    Colin Wyers      (see all posts) 2008/06/16 (Mon) @ 02:36

Tonight the Cubs were leading 7 to 2, with a runner on second and third, two outs, seventh inning. Lou Piniella brings in his best reliever, Carlos Marmol. I couldn’t believe it. LI was .45.

Meanwhile, the previous inning, Lou lets Ted Lilly, the starter, pitch to Rod Barajas with runners on first and second, one out. LI there is 2.55. Lilly was over 100 pitches at that point.


Page 1 of 1 pages


Name (required)
E-Mail (optional)
Website (optional)

<< Back to main