THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

<< Back to main

Wednesday, November 10, 2010

Historical marginal $ per marginal win

By Tangotiger, 05:50 PM

Someone asked me for this, and I realized that I’ve never really shown it.  Using data compiled by Rodney Fort, I derived it below.  Let me read that first line:
In 2009, the minimum salary was 400,000$, which if you had 30 players on the payroll means you have to pay 12 million$.  The average team payroll was over 88 million$, meaning that the payroll above the minimum is over 76 million$.  The number of wins above the minimum (which I treat it as a .300 win%) is 32.4 wins (which is constant every year).  So, I simply take marginal payroll divided by marginal wins to give me 2.36 MM$ per win (column 2).

A free agent win is close to 2 times that average being paid (don’t forget, the average includes all the slave and arb players).  You can double everything in column 2 to get close to free agent wins.  Note that Fangraphs, Baseball-Reference, and Baseball Prospectus all use a different level for the minimum win% (something like .250 for BPro, .280 for Fangraphs, and .320 for B-R, so you need to modify that column, which will affect column 2).

Year    $/win    Min Salary    Min Payroll    Avg Payroll    Marginal Payroll    Marginal Wins
2009    2.36    
$400,000     $12,000,000     $88,513,240     $76,513,240     32.4
2008    2.40    
$390,000     $11,700,000     $89,547,849     $77,847,849     32.4
2007    2.20    
$380,000     $11,400,000     $82,633,133     $71,233,133     32.4
2006    2.09    
$327,000     $9,810,000     $77,556,956     $67,746,956     32.4
2005    1.96    
$316,000     $9,480,000     $73,062,963     $63,582,963     32.4
2004    1.85    
$300,000     $9,000,000     $69,042,265     $60,042,265     32.4
2003    1.91    
$300,000     $9,000,000     $70,938,804     $61,938,804     32.4
2002    1.90    
$200,000     $6,000,000     $67,489,317     $61,489,317     32.4
2001    1.83    
$200,000     $6,000,000     $65,428,127     $59,428,127     32.4
2000    1.54    
$200,000     $6,000,000     $55,859,404     $49,859,404     32.4
1999    1.30    
$200,000     $6,000,000     $48,164,181     $42,164,181     32.4
1998    1.09    
$170,000     $5,100,000     $40,343,644     $35,243,644     32.4
1997    1.03    
$150,000     $4,500,000     $38,011,906     $33,511,906     32.4
1996    0.89    
$109,000     $3,270,000     $31,990,030     $28,720,030     32.4
1995    0.87    
$109,000     $3,270,000     $31,502,705     $28,232,705     32.4
1994    0.87    
$109,000     $3,270,000     $31,593,688     $28,323,688     32.4
1993    0.84    
$109,000     $3,270,000     $30,595,721     $27,325,721     32.4
1992    0.83    
$109,000     $3,270,000     $30,149,844     $26,879,844     32.4
1991    0.66    
$100,000     $3,000,000     $24,231,172     $21,231,172     32.4
1990    0.45    
$100,000     $3,000,000     $17,470,189     $14,470,189     32.4
1989    0.35    
$68,000     $2,040,000     $13,496,818     $11,456,818     32.4
1988    0.29    
$62,500     $1,875,000     $11,339,223     $9,464,223     32.4

(Click on the thread header to see all the data that is covered.)


#1    Tangotiger      (see all posts) 2010/11/10 (Wed) @ 18:08

By the way, I inferred the min salary.  If someone has corrected values, please post.


#2    ElBonte      (see all posts) 2010/11/10 (Wed) @ 18:50

And, my, what nice, well-formed, not impossible to read columns!  You must have taken that advice about learning HTML to heart.


#3    philly      (see all posts) 2010/11/10 (Wed) @ 19:02

By the way, I inferred the min salary.  If someone has corrected values, please post.

I have the same values from a table provided by the MLBPA to a newspaper.


#4    birdo      (see all posts) 2010/11/11 (Thu) @ 16:13

Isn’t .3 x 162 = 48.6?


#5    Guy      (see all posts) 2010/11/11 (Thu) @ 16:28

Yes, and 81 - 48.6 = 32.4, which is the average number of wins above replacement.


#6    Tangotiger      (see all posts) 2010/11/11 (Thu) @ 16:37

Someone sent me documentation that the minimum salary here:
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/baseball/mlbfs90.htm
And here:
http://www.baseball-almanac.com/yearly/yr2008n.shtml
(change “2008” as approporiate)

1996 should be 122,667, not 109,000. 

2002 should be 300,000 not 200,000.

I’m not sure that is correct.  The way I inferred it was pretty simple: I took the Pappas data, and simply counted which salary figure had at least 30 players being paid that exact amount and made sure it made some sense.

This is the data I got:
yearID salary n
1988 62500 41
1989 68000 83
1990 100000 191
1991 100000 47
1992 109000 58
1993 109000 145
1994 109000 108
1995 109000 213
1996 109000 116
1997 150000 125
1998 170000 143
1999 200000 164
2000 200000 43
2001 200000 44
2002 200000 42
2003 300000 98
2004 300000 47
2005 316000 46
2006 327000 55
2007 380000 81
2008 390000 71
2009 400000 67

As you can see, it seems pretty straightforward.  So, I’m perplexed by the other figures being cited.


Page 1 of 1 pages


Name (required)
E-Mail (optional; WILL be published)
Website (optional)

<< Back to main


Latest...

COMMENTS

May 25 06:43
Largest demonstration in Canadian history?

May 25 06:39
Lack of hustle during a game

May 25 02:38
NFLPA lawsuit against collusion

May 25 01:43
Neal Huntington’s best moves

May 24 23:50
Rooting for laundry

May 24 17:04
Firefox, IE, or Chrome?

May 24 12:07
How to beat the shift

May 24 11:11
Incredible story

May 24 09:41
Racial bias in card collecting: not the collectors, but the players on the cards

May 24 08:13
espnW for hockey: CBC’s WhileTheMenWatch.com